[TigersEye]

I saw a lot of it coming this way. I also noted that you refuse to answer some simple questions about how WND altered your article and created a hoax. If you were really so worried about your reputation I would think you wouldn't even need to be asked to put it all in black and white.

"Go read the article" isn't an answer it's an evasion.

[Brian Kopp DPM]

Go read the articles and compare them, then see post # 495.

It must be fairly obvious to most objective observers; it was so obvious to the moderators here, that they moved this thread from bloggers to Front Page News.

That is something they rarely if ever do. They would not violate their own standards in this regard unless it was that blatantly obvious.

If you can’t see or refuse to see that which everyone else is seeing, my going through it line by line for you won’t be of much assistance to you.

[Brian Kopp DPM]

put it all in black and white

I would be happy to do a line by line comparison, but I was forbidden from posting the entire WND article on FR by Jim Robinson. WND does not permit posting of entire articles on FR, they must be excerpted. Jim Robinson would not grant a waiver on this for this article even though I was named as the "author" on the WND article.

So all I can do is point you to the two articles and tell you to compare them yourself.

(Apparently there is a history here between FR and WND to which we are not privy.)