[Niteflyr]

So what more closely describes the only description of the event we have from the only reported eyewitness of the event. A point 35 miles to the north of Catalina Island, or an aircraft that tracks right over Catalina Island?

I guess you aren't getting the point I'm making. That chopper had GPS on board you can be sure...they knew exactly where they were...you need to ask Leyvas was the event over Catalina..(what does "near" mean?) or to the northwest? Seem like such a simple question for him to answer. I am "brilliant" enough to not go chasing and wasting my time getting answers that could be easily gleaned from the horses mouth...;o)

[Rokke]

"Seem like such a simple question for him to answer. I am "brilliant" enough to not go chasing and wasting my time getting answers that could be easily gleaned from the horses mouth...;o)"

He already did answer the question. He said "near" Catalina Island. MY point is that you cannot use a graphic produced by some media source to make a claim that the event Leyvas filmed was no where near the UPS902 flightpath, when the media graphic does not match the description of the person who filmed the event. The graphic is not accurate. The UPS902 flightpath was "near" Catalina Island. The yellow dot pasted on the media graphic is not.