And yet, the overwhelming evidence clearly shows that this was an airplane contrail. Your semantic games notwithstanding.
If you were confident of that you wouldn't spew out inane statements like this to bolster your position.
By the way, I just drove half way across the continent and saw multiple contrails that looked every bit as much the missile launch as the one in question here.
Then back pedal off of it.
I haven't either. Not one. So what's your point?