Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two bank failures bring year's tally to 151
Market Watch ^ | December 10, 2010 | Wallace Witkowski

Posted on 12/11/2010 3:32:13 PM PST by george76

One bank failure in Pennsylvania and one in Michigan brought the year's tally of failures to 151, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Friday. Regulators closed Paramount Bank of Farmington Hills, Mich., and Earthstar Bank of Southampton, Pa....

The total cost to the FDIC deposit insurance fund is $113.1 million

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Michigan; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bankfailures; michigan; pennsylvania; shariahlending

1 posted on 12/11/2010 3:32:18 PM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

I heard that in Canada they have 3 or 5 banks in the entire country. Perhaps we will end up with something similar. In the U.S. we must have a million banks. A lot of these banks that are closing are really very small regional banks. Probably only had one office in a town, state and country.


2 posted on 12/11/2010 3:39:31 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

There are 20 or so Canadian banks, and about twice that many foreign banks operating in Canada. There are, however, about 500 credit unions, some of them huge.


3 posted on 12/11/2010 3:54:56 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Absent the Fed and the smoke and mirrors Jethro Bodine could probably count the the solvent American banks without taking off his shoes.


4 posted on 12/11/2010 4:30:33 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
The total cost to the FDIC deposit insurance fund US taxpayers is $113.1 million.

Who are they trying to kid?

AFAIK, the taxpayers are the only source of revenue available to the government.

IMHO, the rules and regs for banks should be structured so that this could not happen. The Feds are reacting instead of acting. Typical.

5 posted on 12/11/2010 5:26:36 PM PST by upchuck (When excerpting please use the entire 300 words we are allowed. No more one or two sentence posts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
That FDIC really turned out to be a great deal! The government makes sure I don't lose my bank deposits by backing them up with my tax dollars. No zero sum game there!

I remember when the Savings and Loan debacle occurred and we had to make sure that sweet little granny that had more than 100k in deposits had to have every cent protected, even though the FDIC was only supposed to cover up to the first 100k. Certainly no taxpayer money was required to see to it that granny kept all her dough.

But it really doesn't matter because like every other govt program there are loopholes galore. So many people now have several accounts each kept safely under the 100k maximum just in case that limit is ever respected.

Sheesh.

6 posted on 12/11/2010 10:49:32 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson