Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAV is latest Air Force plane tested to run on alternative fuel
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 12/3/2010 | Anna Mulrine

Posted on 12/08/2010 11:07:35 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

That's the latest from the Air Force, which has been running tests to see how its aircraft perform burning something other than straight jet fuel. The initiative is aimed not only at shrinking its carbon footprint and spurring alternative fuels development, but also at strengthening national security.

Monday's alternative fuel test of the Global Hawk UAV was considered one of the most challenging yet for the Air Force.

The drone that flies at high altitudes and low temperatures was one of the last that the Air Force needed to test in its current spate of trial runs before its fleet is certified to run on a 50-50 blend of jet fuel and alternative fuels.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; alternativefuel; aviationfuel; jetfuel; uav; usaf

1 posted on 12/08/2010 11:07:37 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Will it run on Chevy Volt batteries?


2 posted on 12/08/2010 11:21:15 PM PST by tired1 (Federalize the Fed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired1

Many UAV’s out there run on some sort of battery. Where its fuel cell, lithium ion(car battery)or rechargable batteries.


3 posted on 12/08/2010 11:24:15 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tired1

Many UAV’s out there run on some sort of battery. Where its fuel cell, lithium ion(car battery)or rechargable batteries.


4 posted on 12/08/2010 11:24:22 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Yeah I hope this weapon of war leaves a lighter “carbon footprint” ...


5 posted on 12/08/2010 11:49:00 PM PST by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minutemen

The Air Force is wasting their valuable resources on this.


6 posted on 12/08/2010 11:50:11 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Not necessarily: petroleum-based fuel has to be brought into theater by the supply chain, since petroleum refineries are large and not easily transportable. A biofuel might be producable on-site, maybe even from the material left over from cutting an unimproved runway. That in turn would make the AF a lot more mobile and harder to kill.


7 posted on 12/09/2010 12:06:16 AM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
Well, at least the USAF hasn't brought back the NB-36H flying nuclear reactor testbed. In the 1950s, the USAF and Russians seriously considered nuclear powered bombers (unlimited range, ya know). Then, someone asked the question: “What happens if the nuclear-powered airplane crashes (because even the best planes do)?”

There was a pregnant pause, the various program offices went “Ummm”, and then dropped the concept (After spending millions, of course).

One other piece of trivia about the NB-36H: whenever the plane flew, a C-119 “Flying Boxcar” loaded with armed paratroopers accompanied it. If the NB-36H crashed, the paratroopers were to jump and cordon off the crash site until USAF decontamination and crash investigators could arrive. NOT a good plan, especially for the paratroopers.

8 posted on 12/09/2010 3:06:59 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
The Air Force is wasting their valuable resources on this.

The US military is the ultimate early adopter of new technologies, often the first customer when no other customers can afford the price. The price then falls over time until the new technology is cheaper than what it replaces, which leads to new wealth for America. Military spending on new technologies is the reason America is now the wealthiest country in the world. Do you need examples? Petroleum will likely be replaced by genetically engineered ocean grown saltwater algae developed for the US military, which happens to be the largest user of petroleum in the world. The replacement will never come from Al Gore or the environmentalists. Obama is cutting DARPA's budget to fund more foodstamps.

9 posted on 12/09/2010 4:03:57 AM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I’d like to see them test these new technologies on Air Force One.


10 posted on 12/09/2010 5:17:19 AM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
Well, at least the USAF hasn't brought back the NB-36H flying nuclear reactor testbed. In the 1950s, the USAF and Russians seriously considered nuclear powered bombers (unlimited range, ya know). Then, someone asked the question: “What happens if the nuclear-powered airplane crashes (because even the best planes do)?”

There was a pregnant pause, the various program offices went “Ummm”, and then dropped the concept (After spending millions, of course).

That's a shame because the US also built a nuclear rocket engine that performed up to every expectation. They decided to blow it up on purpose while it was operating to see what would happen. There was no fallout whatsoever.

11 posted on 12/09/2010 5:24:10 AM PST by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson