Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT's Krugman Slips and Tells the Truth about 'Death Panels'
American Thinker ^ | 12/8/10 | Holly Pitt Young

Posted on 12/08/2010 3:40:27 PM PST by FTJM

Nat Hentoff certainly is no conservative but he is a principled civil libertarian who has stood up for life since his days writing in the Village Voice. Unlike most liberals, Hentoff fears that the threat of rationing under the President's health care plan is not only real but imminent and he is willing to go after those who advocate rationing of care leaving no sacred cows behind. That's why Paul Krugman is now in Hentoff's sights and he is firing at will.

In a recent column, Hentoff writes:

Paul Krugman, Nobel Prize winner in economics and an influential New York Times columnist, also has a blog, "The Conscience of a Liberal." On ABC's "This Week" (Nov. 14), during a discussion on balancing the federal budget against alarming deficits, he proclaimed the way to solve this problem is through deeply cost-effective health-care rationing.

"Some years down the pike," he said, "we're going to get the real solution, which is going to be a combination of death panels and sales taxes." That would mean the U.S. Debt Reduction Commission "should have endorsed the panel that was part of the (Obama) health-care reform."

Sarah Palin was one of the first, and the most resounding, to warn us of the coming of government panels to decide which of us -- especially, but not exclusively, toward the end of life -- would cost too much to survive.

She was mocked, scorned from sea to shining sea, including by the eminent Paul Krugman for being, he said, among those spreading "the death penalty lie" as part of "the lunatic fringe." (Summarized in "Krugman Wants 'Death Panels'" Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights (Nov. 15).

Soon after he had left the ABC Studio, someone must have alerted Krugman that -- gee whiz--- he had publicly rooted for death panels!

Swiftly, on his blog, Krugman admitted he had indeed said those dreaded words, but:

"What I meant is that health care costs will have to be controlled, which will surely require having Medicare and Medicaid decide what they're willing to pay for -- not really death panels, of course, but consideration of medical effectiveness and, at some point, how much we're willing to spend for extreme care."

"Extreme care," Professor Krugman? To be defined by government commissions, right?

The first battle in the death panel wars is underway and the winner will be declared on December 17. On that day, the Food and Drug Administration will determine whether insurance and Medicare should provide breast cancer patients and their doctors the option of using Avastin -- a late-stage cancer drug that has been proven to extend life. Should the FDA deny coverage for the drug because of its cost, it will be apparent that Krugman and his ilk are winning to battle to ration care in America. Rest assured we are watching the outcome.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deathpanel; hentoff; krugman; palin

1 posted on 12/08/2010 3:40:31 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FTJM


2 posted on 12/08/2010 3:43:11 PM PST by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Nat has to realize he's on the wrong side to argue against Obamacare.
3 posted on 12/08/2010 4:03:51 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

I may get flamed for this, but there are death panels and there are death panels. As long as we have cost shifting, we are eventually going to hit a limit on what can be spent, and to some extent that cap is going to be assigned through reviewers... death panels, if you will. But, it should be known what is available and what isn’t.

My fear of a death panel is a vision of some incompetents sitting around looking at your casefile, checking for your political clout, and INDIVIDUALLY, rather than on an overall treatment effectiveness basis, deciding that you don’t deserve a particular type of care, while someone’s relative or political contributor up the street, with the same medical status, gets the care.


4 posted on 12/08/2010 4:39:30 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (/s, in case you need to ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
My fear of a death panel is a vision of some incompetents sitting around looking at your casefile, checking for your political clout, and INDIVIDUALLY, rather than on an overall treatment effectiveness basis, deciding that you don’t deserve a particular type of care, while someone’s relative or political contributor up the street, with the same medical status, gets the care.

Health care has to be rationed, we can not provide 100% for everyone. It is currently being rationed. The question is WHO decides the rationing. It will always get down to an individual decision. Politics will be part of that decision more in the future than it is now. Your fears are well founded.

When I pay for it, I decide, when someone pays for it (even if it is with my money), they decide.

5 posted on 12/08/2010 4:55:21 PM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

Tick... Tock...


6 posted on 12/08/2010 8:49:07 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson