Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat

“You read what you need to, no more, even if’s accessible by you. The rules are quite clear.”

The rules, then, in this case, are stupid. The very notion that reading the New York Times can get you in trouble is insane, and those who would enforce the rules are mindless robots. They might as well be red light cameras busting cars for rolling one millionth of one millimeter into the crosswalk before stopping.


32 posted on 12/07/2010 3:37:35 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane
"The very notion that reading the New York Times can get you in trouble is insane, and those who would enforce the rules are mindless robots."

I don't believe the mindless robots posting here are paying any attention to you.

33 posted on 12/07/2010 3:51:33 PM PST by An Old Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Tublecane

I know the rules sound stupid, but yours is the attitude that leads to security leaks. You follow the rules, period. You are not in such a position of authority to be able to deem a rule “stupid” and thus to be ignored. That helps prevent security leaks.


35 posted on 12/08/2010 7:20:46 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson