To: prairiebreeze
Indirect reference to republicans as “hostage takers”.I couldn't believe he said that. Could he possibly be more divisive?
173 posted on
12/07/2010 12:10:58 PM PST by
Junior_G
(Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
To: Junior_G
“...Could he possibly be more divisive?...”
Short answer.....YES.
252 posted on
12/07/2010 12:38:13 PM PST by
NCC-1701
(HEY, NAZI PELOUSY, ON NOVEMBER 2, WE WILL DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
To: Junior_G
Indirect reference to republicans as “hostage takers”. I think I saw him greet camera( not the people) and then ringing echoes in my ears the whole time reagrding (the enemy) the rep congress as "hostage takers" and how his hands were tied,"...this is their holy grail" statement floored me. I think that's when I shot the TV then collapsed in either rage or some blood pressure issue I've never had before. The whole interview was a blur of nastiness and lies.
300 posted on
12/07/2010 2:08:12 PM PST by
Karliner
(Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson