Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Again?

I read all the arguments pro and con the last time around. Boeing has its problems, but it seems to me that Airbus has far worse problems. Like a tendency to fall apart in midair. And this EADS tanker, though it will carry more, will be too big for many fields or even theaters of operation.

I suspect that the key consideration is that powerful politicians want it to be built in Mobile.


7 posted on 12/06/2010 6:44:31 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
...powerful politicians want it to be built in Mobile.

We all know that 90% of the work will be done in the EU. The Airbus tanker is a modification of an existing aircraft, already in production. Airbus will fly white-tail A/C, minus interior parts, to Mobile. I really doubt EADS will relocate or duplicate airframe production here. Some work may be done in Mobile to militarize the A/C, but I see only a handful of jobs gained in the US.

12 posted on 12/06/2010 7:01:18 PM PST by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson