Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goat granny

See Post #23.


132 posted on 12/07/2010 8:50:23 AM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel. - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: RangerM
Sorry RangerM I read post 23 and it is not an answer to the question I asked....what is your definition of depth and what potential runner has it and why doesn't Palin have it....she is not for open borders, or Mitts health care if that is your opinion of depth, your a liberal and no conservative using that as your criteria...

No one that uses the lack of depth to argue against Palin, has never said what their definition of depth is and why others have it and she doesn't....

For some I think the reason they don't like Palin is because she is not a male....She is far more conservative than any males that have been mentioned so far. Even Newt thinks he is qualified, so does loser McCain, and these males have conservative depth of about 1/2 inch....

Those same people probably thought Dole had depth or McCain was deep. Bush was a great CIC but had no depth in domestic policy any deeper than Old Teddy Kennedy.

Sorry but depth was the word you used and #23 says nothing cause we cannot read your mind to decipher what you mean...

Again, What is your definition of political depth, the word you chose to use..

138 posted on 12/07/2010 10:11:05 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson