I agree. Sarah is the perfect choice for this.
Hey - finally some sense! I have ZERO desire for Sarah to run for or become POTUS. She is best suited as an attack dog and energizer, which is what the RNC head is suppose to be.
Steele has been a HUGE disappointment to me, and many others.
No, she's not. By taking such a job, she would subordinate herself to the very GOP beltway poo-bahs who are trying to stop her. It would be just as big of a trap as the governor's office was in Alaska with the anklebiters trying to take her down both politically and financially.
And why would she want to pack up her family and move from Wasilla just to take orders from the current GOP leadership? Keep in mind that the RNC chairman is not that powerful and reports to a sort of board of directors, which is why Steele is getting his wings clipped.
The DNC is organized differently, with power more centralized in its chairmen. Big difference, and so you're talking about two different animals!
I agree she would be perfect for the job.That would keep her from running for Pres.
She would better serve all of us if she is head of RNC.
If she doesn’t run in 2012, that position would be ideal for her.
But she would make an even better president.
This is meant to create another Palin resignation. She would not be able to run for Pres and hold that position. She would have to resign and she could not overcome another resignation. The proposal to make her head of the RNC is a proposal to end her career.
Possibly a good move.
Certainly better than Steele.
I don’t want Sarah put into any osition where she does not have the freedom to do as she pleases- where she pleases —& say what she pleases.
It is an insult!