I’m not fun of Palin or Huck either.
But I defend them both.
If they become President, I will support them 100% in achieving the conservative goals.
Plus, I will always be their Number 1 critic in terms of policy.
I’M FAN OF LIBERTARIANISM (CLASSICAL LIBERALISM) AND LATER CONSERVATISM. I THINK SENATOR DEMINT IS THE BEST FOR THE JOB. I HOPE HE RUNS IN THE PRIMARY DESPITE THE FACT HE LACKED THE “EXECUTIVE/GOVERNORSHIP” CREDO.
That doesn’t mean that I am blind with the executive credentials of Gov. Palin: 2 1/2 years leading to a sterling budget improvements in Alaska and a huge natural gas project. That’s besides the the obvious limitations of a governor’s powers in AK (State Legislative branch in AK is relatively more powerful than the governor’s office.)
There’s a difference between us:
I BELIEVE THAT YOUR “DIVIDE AND CONQUER” STRATEGY IS DECEITFUL.
I'd support Palin 100% in a general election and as President, but I'm honestly not at all sure that Huckabee's goals are conservative.
There’s a difference between us: I BELIEVE THAT YOUR “DIVIDE AND CONQUER” STRATEGY IS DECEITFUL.
I don't get this. I'm not a professional political strategist or kingmaker, so I don't know how my expressed desire that Huckabee run so as to take primary votes from Palin can be "deceitful" at all. Especially given that I came stratight out and said exactly why I'd like him to run.
Would it be "deceitful" is I admitted hoping that Obama would have a significant primary challenger because it might split the Democratic Party?