No you did not originally say “sloppy or dishonest”... You said “WND uses sleazy methods” (see post #74) because you did not like what they said.
Or both or either take your pick. Sloppy and dishonest is pretty sleazy in my lexicon.
because you did not like what they said.
No, because of the evidence I posted.
They completely mischaracterize the NORAD response, they are "dishonest" about what the FAA said (in their original story that this one is hyping), they claim "the Department of Defense is slamming the door on questions" and then post paragraphs of response from the DOD.
A major point of their story is the government being cagey or unclear about whether it was a missile - just not true. Read the actual statements.
And the lead of the story making some big conspiracy about the Navy warning about missile launches in a major test site is, well, sleazy reporting.