[D-fendr]

I used to be an editor, I ask you to do what any good editor would do: ask for what facts you have to back up any conclusions you make (a journalist should avoid conclusions unless they are very very solid, and even then a good journalist doesn't make them.)

What in the article's facts - real facts from real sources - are sufficient evidence for these editorial statements by the author:

"The Department of Defense is slamming the door on questions about the mysterious contrail…"

"…the refusal to provide answers to specific questions suggests a cover-up of potential secret missile testing in the area…"

If the author, F. Michael Maloof, can't back this up, his editor should strike them from the article.

[TigersEye]

Yes, he should.

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

If the author, F. Michael Maloof, can't back this up, his editor should strike them from the article.

Are you kidding? This is WND we're talking about. The editor probably put those in.