Replies

Seriously, what is your native tongue?

Do you not understand what constitutes evidence?

We were talking about the murder of Ron Brown, and I picked one of your articles at random: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=7040.

It has absolutely nothing about the "murder" of Ron Brown. It mentions some business trips he took with the usual cast of criminals in and around the Clinton Administration.

Ron Brown was a shady crook. So was Bill Clinton, and Wu and Riady and Charlie Trie and that entire cast of characters.

When a scumbag dies in a plane crash, it does not follow as day follows night, that one of the other scumbags killed him. Making that next step would require some actual evidence that a murder took place.

WND has no evidence. Learn your terms and definitions. They have speculation and heresay from "sources familiar with the investigation."

I don't know if Ron Brown was murdered but it seems to me that crashing a plane with 33 other people on it in a foreign country without leaving any witnesses or evidence behind would be just about the most complicated way to do it. Oh, and then having an assassin within walking distance of the crash site, just in case the target of your conspiracy just happens to be left alive after the crash (which he was, heavens!) while all around him are dead would require a level of preparation and foresight not generally associated with a government operation.

Generally, if you want to off a guy, you throw him in a car and just disappear him. Or fake a mugging and stab him in the neck. Or shoot him and then dump his body in Ft. Marcy park. But WND figured out the real story. They always do.