Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: November 2010
Paul voted for a tax increase by voting against a tax increase. That makes sense to you?

He voted for the bill that raises taxes on anyone making over $250K per year but extends the tax cuts for people making less than $250K per year. That was Pelosi's bill he voted for. The Republican alternative, which he rejected, extended the tax cut to all tax payers.

In other words, the result of the bill Paul voted for is that people making over $250K will see an increase in their taxes.

40 posted on 12/03/2010 1:12:13 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring

No the higher income taxes weren’t in the bill. I get what you are saying, you should get what I’m saying. Paul makes it a point of pride that he never votes for a tax increase. To vote against the continuation of the middle class tax cuts would have been to vote for a tax increase.

I think this is really about trying to deny Paul his chairmanship where he can question the Fed. I think he’s right for that position, one of the few positions most Republican voters would agree he’s right for. The leadership may try to stop that.


59 posted on 12/03/2010 1:23:16 PM PST by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson