There is no “un-trying” anything with liberal laws. It gets it - you are stuck with it. With homosexuals it is always about them, their lifestyle and their needs.
The Wikileaks ‘Gay’ Connection
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/newsarchives.php?id=7661895
Colonel Ron Ray in his 1993 book Military Necessity and Homosexuality noted
Even if homosexuals are not turned by foreign agents, evidence exists that homosexuals, as a group or subculture, can and do turn against their country simply on account of the nature of homosexuality and its hostile attitude toward the existing moral order. This fact is illustrated by a well known group of preeminent writers, thinkers, artists and high social figures known as Bloomsburys who began to reform English tastes before the second world war. That period, termed modernity, saw the supplanting of the fixed moral norms with another ethos. The key to understanding modernity and Bloomsbury is sodomy: Bloomsburys wanted to live as they wanted to live. Along with their homosexuality they developed an amoral, irreligious attitude and were unpatriotic as well. E.M. Forster, a member of the Bloomsbury, was quoted as saying, If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country
Another one of its members, Sir Anthony Blunt, a member of the British Intelligence [and a notorious homosexual], became a traitor and breached security, thereby causing many to die. He regularly passed highly classified information on to a nation which would become the primary foe of the free world: the Soviet Union. He once remarked to an intelligence colleague near the end of World War II, it has given me great pleasure to have been able to turn over the names of every MI-5 officer to the Russians.
A concise summary of the problem with inviting homosexuals into highly confidential circles is drawn from the memoirs of Police Commissioner Hans von Tresckow, who headed the equivalent of the Berlin vice squad from 1905 to 1919:
[I]t is not the sense of duty towards one’s fellow-men or the nation that forms the rule of conduct for homosexualists; but in every turn of life and in all their striving they think only of the good or harm they may do to their own clique of friends.
does the senate have the votes to break a filibuster?
does the house have the votes to get to this issue?