Posted on 12/03/2010 10:43:04 AM PST by roses of sharon
That's never, ever, ever the case. The sin is the failure to mitigate evil. It is far better to have a Scott Brown than a Martha Coakley. Conservatives were 100 percent right to support Brown.
Yeah. No one should have thought Brown was rock ribbed. He’s just a temporory trade-up. Six years from now, a primary challenge could attempt another trade-up. I don’t think even Brown realises how far to the right 80% of the nation is shifting.
Another possibility:
2011 — Barney Frank, scandal ridden, exposed by even more sandal evidence. Economy still struggles. Entire democrat party loses even more ground in the polls. 2012 — Mass. dumps all democrats.
[Depends on the courage of conservatives to expose the left.]
Who will rescue the DNC from their Obama albotross? What state will grow even more affectionate toward them?
HILLARY: Secretary of State will be ‘my last public position’...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20024551-503544.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody
“Conservatives were 100 percent right to support Brown.”
Right.
I had the pleasure to speak with a couple tax-pukus refugees. One of them fled from the state this year. The blue states are being depopulated, scattering to the four winds. Look at Detroit.
The left is demoralized, milling in confusion.
I couldn't agree more, but with Brown I feel like we were sold a bill of goods and half of the apples were rotten. He talked the talk, but the walk is more like a limp.
Hell, the whole lefty/socialist movement is shot through with homos from top to bottom. It is a landing pad for misfits, especially fudge packers.
Homos are a bunch of self-loathing, miserable, anti-social bastards with a “mad at the world” attitude who want to tear down everything that Americans hold dear. In fact, anything that carries with it a sense of normality, morality, or tradition is offensive to those sickos.
I seem to remember the first line of the instructor’s first lecture in first year Biology:
“The purpose of any organism is to reproduce.”
Yep, sounds like the butt munchers come up short on the “normality” scale.
Yes. And wherever they go, they take their liberal voting habits with them.
Take south Florida, for instance.
IOW, the only thing that I could have been was pleasantly surprised.
Which I'm not.
So the fight continues.
Yeah, scattered leftists can be annoying the way they try to “improve” the states they flee too.
Desensitized much?
Been there, did that - the "un-try" was called World War II:“The Pink Swastika is a powerful exposure of pre-World War II Germany and its quest for reviving and imitating a Hellenistic-paganistic idea of homo-eroticism and militarism.”
Dr. Mordechai Nisan, Hebrew University of JerusalemIs it 1933 yet, again?
Hook...Line...and Sinker...
I think the plan is to invade Iran and they want to send the gays in first.
As the old bumper stickers used to read, “We don’t care how you did it up North”
Haha!
At least they are scattered more thinly and unplugged from their failed culture.
I was a refugee from California and now converted to rock ribbed conservative. Change does occur.
Thinly?
A trip to Broward or Palm Beach County would convince you otherwise. To say those are wall-to-wall Northeast liberal is only a mild exaggeration.
The real oldsters are packed into condos and apartments which makes them soooo easy to get to the polls to vote “D” every time. Just a sandwich and a list of preferred candidates is about all it takes. Or so I hear.
New England rats might dominate a small nearby state like New Hampshire, but so far as the state level is concerned, I believe they get largely absorbed. Sure, a county here and there will get overrun.
And they give us the joys of congress critters like Debbie Wasserman and Ted Deutch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.