Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking

Thanks for that. I was unaware of the details of the Wyoming FFA; and for some reason mistook your initial remark as a reference to Montana, even though you said Wyoming. My bubu.


36 posted on 12/03/2010 9:35:57 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
No problem. Note that if one of the BATFAGs is convicted, even if he gets the fine, he's now been convicted of a crime for which he "could have been sentenced to at least a year in prison", so he becomes a prohibited person. Let's see them put THAT in their pipe and smoke it.

As far as FFA's in general go, I can't understand a state passing one without this provision, unless that was the only way to get anything passed. "If you violate federal gun laws, you're in no hot water with the state (course you never were in the first place), but if the feds arrest and prosecute you in spite of this law, you're on your own" sounds like empty posturing.

37 posted on 12/03/2010 9:41:20 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson