Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

Well, it didn’t help because it was just you saying she was for amnesty with nothing specific to back it up and a bunch of other people arguing with you saying she isn’t.

I get that illegal immigration is the big issue for you.

I live in Texas. It’s a big issue for me also.

But that thread you sent me to was same old, same old.


95 posted on 12/02/2010 9:59:24 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: altura

Can you read direct quotes from Palin? That’s what they were.


98 posted on 12/02/2010 10:02:49 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: altura; pissant
SHE flat out says it:

"Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.

To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country."

She clearly favors a path to citizenship and acknowledges that it is a form of amnesty, although not "total amnesty" whatever that is. Most Conservatives know that a path to citizenship is amnesty.

102 posted on 12/02/2010 10:06:13 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson