Read up on LOST when you get some time, retard.
I have. LOST is not the slam dunk litmus test you seem to think it is. There are good parts and bad. She had solid thinking when backing it. Remember many high level Naval brass also saw this as a good thing. Her is her cogent thought on the matter.
“If the U.S. does not ratify the convention, the opportunity to pursue our own claims to offshore areas in the Arctic Ocean might well be lost. As a consequence, our rightful claims to hydrocarbons, minerals, and other natural resources could be ignored.” -Sarah Palin
Um, I’m glad you and your friends did all that wonderful vetting of Palin, but it doesn’t help those of us who work for a living and may have missed the specific threads that expose all her alleged closet liberalism. I only have one issue with her that I know of, and that is her states rights approach to abortion, and my position, federal personhood, isn’t even the dominant conservative theory.
So if it wouldn’t trouble you too much, perhaps you could elucidate a bit on your list of complaints? For example, when I look up Palin on global warming, I see her snake oil comment, which is arguably the conservative position, or her theory that warming could be real but its not anthropogenic, a little weaker, but definitely not structured to encourage socialist takeovers via environmentalism. And then there’s LOST. I tried looking it up, but all I’m coming up with is how Bristol LOST. I’m not asking for verbose aid here, just a hint or two as to where this is coming from.
Thanks,
SR