I owe you one.
Cheers!
Posted on 12/02/2010 7:47:53 PM PST by SeekAndFind
I guess you could construe it “longer than that ace”. But those were all within 2 days of each other.
"Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.
To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country."
She clearly favors a path to citizenship and acknowledges that it is a form of amnesty, although not "total amnesty" whatever that is. Most Conservatives know that a path to citizenship is amnesty.
I'll try to find exactly when you started with the DU talking points.....Should be interesting.
The cultists know it too. But they are now reduced to running interference for their goddess. It’s frankly so pathetic, it’s funny.
“Pence is Palin without a following.”
Exactly.
By all means. Please do.
You’re posting misrepresentations again.
in an 09 interview Gov. Palin stated emphatically, twice that she was not for amnesty.
Your assumptions aren’t interesting, your conjecture is vapid.
What about all the rest I didn't post?
We don’t need to run interference. Her power in the political arena has never been stronger than today if you look at it realistically. So why would she need folks to run interference? I mean, yeah, if her popularity was crumbling and her poll numbers were plumetting, ok...but that’s not where we’re at.
Like I said, it lasted a month or so before I started the other way. I think I actually forgot all about her until the cult crowd started telling me she was the next Reagan.
Um, I’m glad you and your friends did all that wonderful vetting of Palin, but it doesn’t help those of us who work for a living and may have missed the specific threads that expose all her alleged closet liberalism. I only have one issue with her that I know of, and that is her states rights approach to abortion, and my position, federal personhood, isn’t even the dominant conservative theory.
So if it wouldn’t trouble you too much, perhaps you could elucidate a bit on your list of complaints? For example, when I look up Palin on global warming, I see her snake oil comment, which is arguably the conservative position, or her theory that warming could be real but its not anthropogenic, a little weaker, but definitely not structured to encourage socialist takeovers via environmentalism. And then there’s LOST. I tried looking it up, but all I’m coming up with is how Bristol LOST. I’m not asking for verbose aid here, just a hint or two as to where this is coming from.
Thanks,
SR
ROFL
Kind of sounds like the Hillary billing records defense "I can't seem to remember".
It’s pretty bad. Nothing she says means anything to them. They infer their own meaning into comments while they stomp their feet and try to scream over people.
Mike who?
Well, why don’t you save those direct quotes and copy them on every thread you come on to trash Palin.
I didn’t see any direct quotes on the thread you sent me to and I don’t see why I should have to wade through the interminable argument on that thread to find anything substantial.
Save the quotes in your word and paste them here. It should be worth that trouble to you if you really want to prove your point.
I didn’t send you to a “thread”. I sent you to one POST on a thread.
“We, our policy, John McCain has been so clear with his policy and it makes a lot of sense too. We secure our borders first. But then with a comprehensive approach we must deal humanely with those who are here, and we must allow the steps to be taken to protect the families of those who are here, maybe as illegal immigrants today.....”
"As governor, how do you deal with them? Do you think they all should be deported?
"There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant - there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants - not only economically is that just an impossibility but that’s not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration.”
Buh-bye.
I owe you one.
Cheers!
“ROFL”
I was expecting a bit more substance but I know you’re busy on this thread. If you have a chance, what part of my statement regarding her present standing would you refute?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.