Skip to comments.
Child Nutrition Bill Sent to President Obama; Michelle Obama Calls Bill 'Groundbreaking'
ABC News ^
| 12/2/10
| Huma Khan
Posted on 12/02/2010 3:52:37 PM PST by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
food scam
1
posted on
12/02/2010 3:52:40 PM PST
by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2
posted on
12/02/2010 3:53:11 PM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
I would trust Jamie Oliver more than Michelle My Belle Obama.
3
posted on
12/02/2010 3:54:23 PM PST
by
Munson
To: Nachum
More government takeover of local decisions—what’s so groundbreaking about that?
4
posted on
12/02/2010 3:54:32 PM PST
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: Nachum
How would not feeding kids meat and fat cost money I think it would be cheaper a cost benefit am I wrong?
5
posted on
12/02/2010 3:54:52 PM PST
by
al baby
(Hi Mom REMEMBER FREE REPUBLIC IN YOUR WILL. I DID)
To: skr
Washington’s First Food Czar... all for the children!
6
posted on
12/02/2010 3:55:13 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: al baby
Here’s a thought-let their parents feed them!
7
posted on
12/02/2010 3:57:20 PM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
To: al baby
They won’t eat it. ‘Rich’ kids won’t buy it. Food program kids will wait for their moms to buy candy bars after school with their food stamps. Oh my gosh, did I really just write that??
8
posted on
12/02/2010 3:57:50 PM PST
by
madameguinot
(Our Father's God to Thee, Author of Liberty)
To: Nachum
So our kids are fat. It is no coincidence that they don’t exercise as much due to schools taking away or reducing recess and gym and the MSM pancaking parents over bugs and potential predators.
9
posted on
12/02/2010 4:00:09 PM PST
by
matt04
To: Nachum

"only "groundbreaking" is under the Wook's feet"
10
posted on
12/02/2010 4:02:52 PM PST
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Nachum
This should go under the statutes on ‘destroying gov’t property’. Since they own our bodies with Obamacare, they want to make sure we don’t put any food into them that they think might damage their property. A simple ‘property rights’ issue - why would ‘free traders’ have a problem with that??? lol .
11
posted on
12/02/2010 4:03:34 PM PST
by
Kent C
To: Nachum
" The $4.5 billion child nutrition bill would ban greasy food and sugary soft drinks from schools. The legislation already passed on a bipartisan vote in the Senate -- triggered criticism for its hefty price tag and new nutritional requirements that some say shouldn't come from the federal government. Wow that is B for billions for the food police .Also how long has this "greasy" food been in schools? Just say no? Well what will be the unintended consequences for this one? Cradle to grave is what this is about.
12
posted on
12/02/2010 4:03:40 PM PST
by
ColdOne
(GOP just say NO. Well that was the plan, what happened? No common ground, EVER!)
To: Nachum
They could ban greasy food and sugary drinks at public schools without spending $4.5 Billion. Whats the money for?
And the federal government should not be controlling public schools either.
13
posted on
12/02/2010 4:04:04 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: Nachum
More welfare for the masses. When will the wild spending stop or at least slow down? Why aren’t parents responsible for feeding their kids? My kids are in their 20’s now and never received a free lunch (Catholic schools which I paid tuition for out of after tax — paying local school taxes too— dollars).
14
posted on
12/02/2010 4:04:29 PM PST
by
kevinm13
(Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
To: madameguinot
Been there..seen that! (teach on an Indian Reservation for some time...like I have...to be sure)
15
posted on
12/02/2010 4:06:10 PM PST
by
the lastbestlady
(I now believe that we have two lives; the life we learn with and the life we live with after that.)
To: madameguinot
Been there..seen that! (teach on an Indian Reservation for some time...like I have...to be sure)
16
posted on
12/02/2010 4:06:17 PM PST
by
the lastbestlady
(I now believe that we have two lives; the life we learn with and the life we live with after that.)
To: the lastbestlady
17
posted on
12/02/2010 4:07:25 PM PST
by
the lastbestlady
(I now believe that we have two lives; the life we learn with and the life we live with after that.)
To: Nachum
$4.5b giveaway is not groundbreaking. he already spent $2+trillion!
18
posted on
12/02/2010 4:12:58 PM PST
by
sappy
(criminalibs)
To: madameguinot
Where I live they already have ‘healthy food’ for school lunches. I would buy the lunch every-so-often because they loved getting their lunch from school, but after some experience both kids gave it up. Now they make a face every time the order form comes home. The complaints consisted of ‘soggy’, ‘doesn’t taste good’, ‘hair in it’, ‘chicken feather on it’... yum.
19
posted on
12/02/2010 4:13:43 PM PST
by
Thidwick
To: Nachum
Just take the money that you spend on bad food and buy healthy food.
What are they spending 4 billion dollars on, awareness ?
20
posted on
12/02/2010 4:14:21 PM PST
by
daku
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson