Do Red Diaper Doper Babies make us safer? NO!
Heck, terrorists don’t have to wait for our next defensive move, they’ve got Janet giving them the play book and pointing out page 38 states it’s too difficult to search the cargo.
Scanners and pat downs have nothing to do with security. This is just to see how many people will object so the government by the elite can move on to the next step of taking away our rights. And on this round about 99.9999 %accepted the process.
Someone at the Slimes has intelligence? Who’d have thunk it?
NYT reporter saying the machines are no good and what we need is intelligence must be their way of welcoming in obama’s new plan.
Warning: “Improvident” language.
Ten years on from 9/11 (almost) we now have this:
Each and every one of 197 airlines that fly to or through the United States will now collect and share passenger information with the government to be checked against terror watch lists.
The Obama administration announced Tuesday the names, genders and birth dates of all passengers will be gathered and checked before the planes fly into the U.S.
in full http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=173777
I also would appreciate hearing from someone from TSA. But, remember they do have security clearances, unlike BHO, so I don’t know how much they can talk about in a public forum.
I’m against the primitive groping but the scanning is an effective way of reducing the options for terrorists. So is having armed air marshals on planes. So is having profiling. We need all effective options.
“We roll out full-body scanners, even though they wouldn’t have caught the Underwear Bomber, so they put a bomb in a printer cartridge.”
Imagine this alternative reality:
We look for all young muslim males, even though they wouldn’t have caught Jane Jihad, so they put a bomb in a baby’s diaper (like the one that was used against Benazir Bhutto)
Message to TSA: It's the Muslims, Stupid.