Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

The real issue with DADT is whether the discussion is about status or behavior. A soldier just being gay is not problematic, but if he knows he can’t be discharged for it, will that lead to wearing makeup in uniform, applying it in the latrine, sex in the barracks, sex in showers and overtly effeminate behavior? Admittedly, most homosexuals don’t or won’t engage in the overt objectionable behavior (many don’t at all) but it will only take a few. Watch the gay pride parades and consider how that “in your face” behavior will be received in a barracks setting. Flaunting the most disgusting behavior seems to be the trademark of some (not all) gays.


19 posted on 12/02/2010 8:50:26 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Spok

How many homosexuals are going to demand promotion in rank to increase their representation? When are they going to establish a GBLT social group on base? etc.

The lawsuits will only begin from the act up crowd if this goes through.


20 posted on 12/02/2010 8:53:55 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson