[Gene Eric]

>> but I at least have to try.

And you should if you have a reasonable case.

Assuming it was an airplane, under these dramatic circumstances would there not be continuous footage of the plane at least passing overhead?

[Yo-Yo]

Assuming it was an airplane, under these dramatic circumstances would there not be continuous footage of the plane at least passing overhead?

Well, first of all the November 9th video was shot from a news helicopter, and news helicopters have their cameras mounted in a ball under the nose of the helicopter, preventing them from shooting overhead.

Second, if this was an airplane, the destination of the airplane was LAX, so by the time it got to the Los Angeles area it would have landed, again preventing it from being shot flying overhead. So, no, there would not be continuous footage of the plane passing overhead.

Hopefully you've continued to read all of this thread, including posts 85 and 119.

Especially Post 119. TXnMA did a fantastic job, and the new (to me) image from the CargoLux security cam of the November 8th "missile" is the final nail in the missile theory coffin for any open-minded person.