Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

I love the you people remark, as though anyone who questions your logic is automatically an idiot.

The tank is not useless, but it CAN be taken out and it doesn’t hold 5,000 people.

You seem to think that it is an impossibllity and when I point out that it isn’t , I become a “You people”

Meanwhile you have decided that with their defense force they are impregnable.

The Titanic was unsinkable too.


69 posted on 12/02/2010 12:09:24 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer

To surrender air superiority because of perceived vulnerability when their is no alternative is stupid. Tell me, how to have air power in the middle of the ocean or against a hostile land force far away from any ally. There is risk yes, but what else is there? Sub launched aircraft?


70 posted on 12/02/2010 12:15:35 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer; central_va
I love the you people remark

And I didn't even see his reference to being a ring knocker.

72 posted on 12/02/2010 12:31:54 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson