Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
"Please answer the question."

Please tell me how your statement is germane to the topic of discussion.

If your implying the force superiority, it would be obvious that one would feel outmatched. Which is one big reason why missiles are so popular; they provide an enormous amount of effectivity against such superior adversaries.

A couple of dozen shore-launched missiles at say, $1 million apiece, will render a carrier out of the fight in a single massive salvo. How much does a carrier cost? Not to mention aircraft, personnel, etc.?

How many missile batteries do the Chinese already have along their coastline?

33 posted on 12/02/2010 8:07:05 AM PST by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower

Exocet and the Falklands


38 posted on 12/02/2010 8:29:13 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
Ok, you are on record as being in favor of foreign governments being superior in sea air assets, including any future aircraft carriers they might deploy. Your point is well taken but not agreed with.

You are so smart; you might want to work for wikileaks.

39 posted on 12/02/2010 8:50:14 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson