To: TSgt
The movie "The Sum of All Fears" showed very clearly how an attack could be mounted on a carrier, using the time-honored communist-bloc tactic "volume of fire".
In my Navy says, this was known, and not with a smile. The phalanx is good, but enough incoming means the carrier's systems would not get them all, and a couple hits are all you need.
15 posted on
12/02/2010 5:09:43 AM PST by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: Joe Brower
Also- and this is the biggest issue.
STEALTH- I believe China, Russia even Iran
will have mastered some of the Stealth technology.
mounted as a swarm we may not be able to detect,
track,and engage fast enough-
16 posted on
12/02/2010 5:16:47 AM PST by
mj1234
To: Joe Brower
In my Navy says, this was known, and not with a smile. The phalanx is good, but enough incoming means the carrier's systems would not get them all, and a couple hits are all you need. Ok, by this logic, it is pretty easy to shoot down a plane, therefore we should use combat aircraft. This non-logic is stupid.
22 posted on
12/02/2010 6:18:31 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: Joe Brower
The movie showed Tu-22M Backfire firing what I presumed to be
AS-4 Kitchens ASM, or
Kh-15 from what looked like 20 miles.
That is not how an attack would occur. For one thing, US carriers have E-2 Hawkeyes (naval AWACS) and keep a combat air patrol near enemy territory. Also, those SPY-1 radars on the Ticonderoga cruisers and Arleigh Burkes are not just for show.
The ChiComs have a copy of the Tu-16, not the Tu22m. I'd be more concerned with an ICBM and submarines.
78 posted on
12/06/2010 2:30:57 AM PST by
rmlew
(You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson