Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Russia’s Stealth Fighter Developments Mean for America
The Heritage Foundation ^ | 11/30/2010 | Mackenzie Eaglen and Lajos F. Szaszdi, Ph.D.

Posted on 12/01/2010 10:12:58 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Russia’s development of the PAK FA fifth-generation stealth fighter could challenge American air supremacy, especially if Russia sells the PAK FA to its usual buyers of military equipment. In the U.S., closure of the F-22 production line has severely limited America’s ability to respond to PAK FA proliferation by building more F-22s and potentially selling them to U.S. allies. The U.S. needs to revise its assessment of U.S. air superiority needs and then explore ways to modernize and strengthen the U.S. tactical fighter force.

With America’s closure of the F-22 production line and the recent debut of Russia’s PAK FA fifth-generation stealth fighter, American air supremacy for the foreseeable future is not as assured as the U.S. Department of Defense once predicted. Indeed, Lieutenant General David A. Deptula, recently departed Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance in the U.S. Air Force, recently made the startling announcement: “For the first time, our claim to air supremacy is in jeopardy.… The dominance we’ve enjoyed in the aerial domain is no longer ours for the taking.”[

(Excerpt) Read more at heritage.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f22; fifthgeneration; pakfa; pentagon; raptor; russia; stealth; stealthfighter; t50; usaf; usmilitary

1 posted on 12/01/2010 10:13:03 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


2 posted on 12/01/2010 10:23:37 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

“With America’s closure of the F-22 production line”

That one cries out to Heaven for grand juries and impeachments.


3 posted on 12/01/2010 10:24:13 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

That article is a lot of hot air.
US air dominance is not in trouble.
The White House will surely get a Republican soon to resume a F-22.
But it is still not the case. Russians have fielded superior designs before but it didn’t help their Third World clients much.
It is not the stuff winning a battle.


4 posted on 12/01/2010 10:27:22 PM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
The PAK FA is a bluff, a shell of an airplane. It has none of the advanced electronics that make planes like the F-22 effective, it's stealthy in looks only, and uses 30 year old engine technology. Like the MiG 1.42 project before it, it'll almost certainly never even see production for Russians, let alone anyone else. Beyond providing a bogeyman to sell more planes for Lockheed, it serves no real purpose other than as a Potemkin village of an airplane. There's no there, there.
5 posted on 12/01/2010 11:11:14 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

I think you are too much critical. In fact Sukhoi already tested most of technologies including AESA radar and 3d thrust vectoring to put into it with a Su-37 testbed since 2002.
They was waiting for an airframe to be designed. I won’t be surprised if they are to start mass produce it in 3-4 years.


6 posted on 12/01/2010 11:31:47 PM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

I think you are off the mark over here. The PAK-FA project seems to be rather well managed by Russian standards. It is of no use comparing it with the Mig 1.42 since they were nearly bankrupt when testing it. In addition to having more funds, they have leveraged new systems developed for the SU-35BM and other platforms to save time as well as reduce risks. It will pushed into service since the Flanker series isn’t going to last forever.


7 posted on 12/02/2010 6:06:51 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson