Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

It in no way “spared property”. The explosive yield of the typical “neutron bomb” was thousands of times larger than the OKC bomb, which as we all know was unkind to property.

It was similar in yield to the Davy Crockett device, but was slower in operation and produced lots of neutrons (shifted neutron-to-gamma ratio).


12 posted on 12/01/2010 10:02:19 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow

True. Here is a link for basic information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

As noted in the “walking ghost” comment at the end of the entry, even the fatally irradiated persons might stay functional and not die for a long period after the explosion (days, weeks, months).

Unmentioned in the entry is what effect all that neutron radiation would have on the structures left behind. In terms of decontamination, it might have been nearly as bad as a pure fission bomb.


14 posted on 12/01/2010 10:10:24 AM PST by Captain Rhino (“Si vis pacem, para bellum” - if you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
It was similar in yield to the Davy Crockett device, but was slower in operation and produced lots of neutrons

The lethal radius (hard X-rays) was quoted in yards not miles. Blast effects were dependent on altitude when detonated.

Just the thing to counter the NKork's "million man army", no?

Regards,
GtG

23 posted on 12/01/2010 11:35:07 AM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson