The point I think your missing is, from Lakin's point of view, he asked (in writing and in person) for his chain of command and his elected representatives to provide answers to his questions on this issue. When they couldn't answer him, or passed the buck, he then decided to take the (in) action that he took.
Because the state run media refuses to discuss the issue, other than to employ Alinski tactics, doesn't mean a significant portion of the country is on to the fraud.
After-all, how can someone who was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England, possibly be a "natural born citizen" of the U.S. as intended by the framers for the position of Commander in Chief?
Do you believe the framers (post grandfather clause) wanted someone born with foreign citizenship to be Commander in Chief eligible?
Okay, let's look at that. First, is it your contention that unless all court challenges are resolved prior to Inauguration, the President isn't holding office lawfully, and his orders can be disobeyed?
Because I'd say that if a President is inaugurated lawfully, in accordance with Constitutional requirements, he remains the lawful President unless and until a court of competent jurisdiction rules otherwise on a dispute regarding the election, citizenship, etc.
Second, at least some of the cases brought challenging Obama's citizenship have already been dismissed, including one that went up to the Supreme Court and which the Court declined to review. At what point do officers have an obligation to obey their orders without playing sea lawyer?
After-all, how can someone who was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England, possibly be a "natural born citizen" of the U.S. as intended by the framers for the position of Commander in Chief?
Okay, I'll play, even though it's irrelevant to the issue. Suppose your dad is serving with the U.S. Air Force in Diego Garcia, where you are born in a U.S. military hospital. Under U.S. law, you're an American citizen. But Diego Garcia is a British territory, so under British law, you were "born a subject to the crown of her Majesty the Queen of England. So despite the fact that your family moved back to the U.S. when you are 3 months old, and you spent the rest of your life in the U.S., the Founders apparently intended that you can't be President.