Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Did a court of law hear a challenge to the Bush question? Was Bush the Commander in Chief prior to those question(s) being resolved in a court of law?

The point I think your missing is, from Lakin's point of view, he asked (in writing and in person) for his chain of command and his elected representatives to provide answers to his questions on this issue. When they couldn't answer him, or passed the buck, he then decided to take the (in) action that he took.

Because the state run media refuses to discuss the issue, other than to employ Alinski tactics, doesn't mean a significant portion of the country is on to the fraud.

After-all, how can someone who was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England, possibly be a "natural born citizen" of the U.S. as intended by the framers for the position of Commander in Chief?

Do you believe the framers (post grandfather clause) wanted someone born with foreign citizenship to be Commander in Chief eligible?

475 posted on 12/07/2010 11:35:09 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid
is'nt on to the fraud.
476 posted on 12/07/2010 11:37:48 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
Did a court of law hear a challenge to the Bush question? Was Bush the Commander in Chief prior to those question(s) being resolved in a court of law.

Okay, let's look at that. First, is it your contention that unless all court challenges are resolved prior to Inauguration, the President isn't holding office lawfully, and his orders can be disobeyed?

Because I'd say that if a President is inaugurated lawfully, in accordance with Constitutional requirements, he remains the lawful President unless and until a court of competent jurisdiction rules otherwise on a dispute regarding the election, citizenship, etc.

Second, at least some of the cases brought challenging Obama's citizenship have already been dismissed, including one that went up to the Supreme Court and which the Court declined to review. At what point do officers have an obligation to obey their orders without playing sea lawyer?

After-all, how can someone who was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England, possibly be a "natural born citizen" of the U.S. as intended by the framers for the position of Commander in Chief?

Okay, I'll play, even though it's irrelevant to the issue. Suppose your dad is serving with the U.S. Air Force in Diego Garcia, where you are born in a U.S. military hospital. Under U.S. law, you're an American citizen. But Diego Garcia is a British territory, so under British law, you were "born a subject to the crown of her Majesty the Queen of England. So despite the fact that your family moved back to the U.S. when you are 3 months old, and you spent the rest of your life in the U.S., the Founders apparently intended that you can't be President.

480 posted on 12/07/2010 12:19:32 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson