>>”Mr.Lakin has been chosen as expendable sacrifice by his superiors.”
>No, Mr. Larkin made himself expendable. The trial will consist of 2 questions: #1: Were you ordered to deploy with your unit? Answer is Yes #2: Did you deploy as ordered? Answer is No. Then he is guilty of missing movement and failure to obey orders. Period.
Do you even understand the nature of authority? If all military authority for orders originate with the commander-in-chief, and the person claiming to be commander-in-chief is not legitimate, then all subordinate orders are invalid.
>Find someone who is really being wronged to put up on a pedestal.
ANYONE who owned GM bonds.
Bonus recipients of the bailout-funds.
Anyone who PAID for the bailout funds.
“If all military authority for orders originate with the commander-in-chief, and the person claiming to be commander-in-chief is not legitimate, then all subordinate orders are invalid.”
So the military is effectively disbanded?
Everybody go home?
pretty good response ( sarcasm on ) Now, please explain to me the meaning of the UCMJ, why it is what it is, and your experience with it.....oh, you do not know, and have no experience with it???? then what the hell are you doing giving your opinion on military judical matters????????