Not even close. Obama is the President, period. I don’t like it one little bit, but that’s fact. Every order he has issued, every bill he has signed, every appointment that he has made is legitimate.
There is not a shread of evidence to refute his legitimacy. There’s plenty of speculation, but speculation is not evidence except in the birther universe. Without any evidence to support the start of impeachment hearings, your musings carry no weight.
Actually, yes; you see there is no requirement of “evidence” for questioning the lawfulness of orders... but there IS a requirement for proving the lawfulness of [the] orders if you are to charge someone with Art 92.