Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

Not even close. Obama is the President, period. I don’t like it one little bit, but that’s fact. Every order he has issued, every bill he has signed, every appointment that he has made is legitimate.

There is not a shread of evidence to refute his legitimacy. There’s plenty of speculation, but speculation is not evidence except in the birther universe. Without any evidence to support the start of impeachment hearings, your musings carry no weight.


312 posted on 12/04/2010 3:03:33 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316

Actually, yes; you see there is no requirement of “evidence” for questioning the lawfulness of orders... but there IS a requirement for proving the lawfulness of [the] orders if you are to charge someone with Art 92.


314 posted on 12/04/2010 3:08:21 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson