[tired_old_conservative]

Sounds a lot like 9th Circuit reasoning where gun control laws are left on the books as "reasonable restrictions" despite the clear language of "shall not be infringed".

It's nothing like that at all. That you think so evidences your lack of knowledge on the subject.

All military authority rests on the Chain of Command. If the CiC isn't eligible to BE in command, then any orders given under that authority are equally invalid.

It's easy calculus.

It's not calculus at all. It's law, in which you are obviously unversed. In the law, simply insisting something is true does not make it so. To insist in the face of established statute reflected in actual court rulings simply demonstrates ignorance.

[editor-surveyor]

> “It’s not calculus at all. It’s law, in which you are obviously unversed. In the law, simply insisting something is true does not make it so.”

.
We sure have a bunch of noobies like you here, since the pretender enconsed himself in the Offal Orifice, that insist that the orders of a pretender are valid.

You’re obviously here to support the coup d’etat and the false courts that presently turn law on its head daily.

I just cannmot imagine why Jim allows this to continue.

I would have installed a filter to auto-zot you and your kind long ago.
.

[Dead Corpse]

It's law, in which you are obviously unversed.

Thanks the Gods for that. Else I'd be able to write any number of laws, or rule on them, that completely defy common sense and logic as in the current case.

It isn't that I do not have a lack of knowledge, it's that I heartily disapprove of how twisted and evil the whole system has become. Both civilian and military alike.

Are you denigrating my legal acumen because you think me ignorant? Or because you support the judges ruling?