While you are well known here as an Obot jamese777, you are correct. That is why the Kerchner complaint charged Cheney, Pelosi, and Congress with denying equal protection under the law. Cmdr. Kerchner sent registered letters asking that Obama be vetted as McCain was. The reason that Obama wasn't vetted was that every Senator knew he was ineligible. But they also knew McCain was almost certainly ineligible too. Every Senator signed Senate Res 511 in hearings for which in the Senate Judiciary Committee the requirement for two citizen parents was repeated by Michael Chertoff and Patrick Leahy.
Nothing important is being hidden. Obama is ineligible because of our common law, repeated in a dozen cases though not essential to a decision. The Congressional Research Service published an internal memo in April 2009, sending it to all in Congress, telling Congress how to respond, how to evade answering the question of Obama’s eligibility. And all of Congress concealed the fact of the fourteen page memo, by request, and because it would reveal that they all knew there was a problem with Obama's eligibility.
What we see here is the corruption of the Supreme Court. The two Obama appointees, Kagan and Sotomayor, whose appointments would have been nullified if the the court confirmed John Marshall, Morrison Waite, Horace Gray, John Bingham, Joseph Story, James Wilson, etc. etc., refused to recuse themselves. That is a clear conflict of interest. It doesn't require an article or amendment to understand that having a judge decide whether her or she is to lose his job is unethical. We do not have an ethical court. They now perform ceremonial functions while it still serves the purpose of the executive to bless their edicts with the adjective "Supreme."
Commander Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo have exposed the coupling of our executive, legislative, and judicial branches. They have exposed the value of having dupes appointed justices of the court. Republicans too have been exposed as complicit. For most the duplicity is personal. Its about money. It is unlikely that Lisa Murkowski ever held a principle that couldn't be bought. Democrats control electoral processes in Alaska and showed that they can put anyone the chose into office. The guarantees in the Declaration and the Constitution are now impressive sounding slogans with no recourse of an honorable court to resolve departures from our core of law.
The only path now is to assert the power of people, and that must start with undoing what George Soros and others undertook before we understood the consequences of not having verifiable elections. We have no way of knowing how people vote, and both parties have failed to insist. Soros funded Acorn years ago, and the Secretary of State Project to help take away representation of and by the people. We haven't a clue how people really vote. While there may still be a few local precincts with party oversight, paper ballots, and hand counts, they are a small minority. No other mechanism today would satisfy a court's chain of evidence requirement, or our FDA's audit trail requirements for drug certification (from personal experience).
After overcoming Acorn and Soros’ Sec. of State. project, and the corruption in most every SEIU administered state election office, we must vet every candidate for adherence to the Constitution, and remove him if they fails. Then we can replace federal and Supreme Court Justices because they have a sworn duty to address violations of the Constitution. The Senate can remove Justices. Federal judges are political appointees. The sudden appearance of a Russian- Educated attorney from the firm of Obama’s Senior Council, Robert Bauer, into the office a federal judge Carter who had promised discovery stinks - it is the appearance of corruption. Carter violated a witnessed promise of discovery if Orly Taitz would forgo her right to discovery since the Government Attorneys had not responded to a properly filed complaint. He lied, probably under duress.
Obama is in violation of the Constitution, having been born a British subject. Every justice is aware of this. Supreme Court justices have grounds for original jurisdiction. They can't question elections, but they can question a violation of Constitutional eligibility. Roberts, who took three tries to administer the oath of office, understands this, and should be impeached. Only Justice Thomas has acknowledged the Court's intransigence.
So jamese777, you are correct. Republicans knew, and protected McCain, because Hillary would surely be president if McCain were exposed late in the election cycle. It would be interesting to know who informed every Republican that they must keep quiet about Obama's ineligibility. Republicans, understandably, didn't have the stomach to remove McCain themselves during the primaries, even though some smart Democrats had spelled out his eligibility problems clearly. An amendment or clarification should make foreign-born children of military citizens eligible, but it hasn't yet happened. The latest to try were Claire McCaskill and Barack Obama in SB 2678 in Feb of 2008.
And you are correct about Roberts. What do they have on Roberts? Was he the holdout? He knew before he administered the oath that Obama was in violation of Article II Section 1, and thus lied when he was sworn. The two Obama appointees should have recused themselves, but there is no law that I know of governing recusal. That they know the words from Minor v. Happersett, and have not done their duty is misprision - seldom used, but appropriate, just as natural born citizenship is a seldom used definition.
While you are well known here as an Obot jamese777, you are correct. That is why the Kerchner complaint charged Cheney, Pelosi, and Congress with denying equal protection under the law. Cmdr. Kerchner sent registered letters asking that Obama be vetted as McCain was. The reason that Obama wasn’t vetted was that every Senator knew he was ineligible. But they also knew McCain was almost certainly ineligible too. Every Senator signed Senate Res 511 in hearings for which in the Senate Judiciary Committee the requirement for two citizen parents was repeated by Michael Chertoff and Patrick Leahy.
Nothing important is being hidden. Obama is ineligible because of our common law, repeated in a dozen cases though not essential to a decision. The Congressional Research Service published an internal memo in April 2009, sending it to all in Congress, telling Congress how to respond, how to evade answering the question of Obama’s eligibility. And all of Congress concealed the fact of the fourteen page memo, by request, and because it would reveal that they all knew there was a problem with Obama’s eligibility.
What we see here is the corruption of the Supreme Court. The two Obama appointees, Kagan and Sotomayor, whose appointments would have been nullified if the the court confirmed John Marshall, Morrison Waite, Horace Gray, John Bingham, Joseph Story, James Wilson, etc. etc., refused to recuse themselves. That is a clear conflict of interest. It doesn’t require an article or amendment to understand that having a judge decide whether her or she is to lose his job is unethical. We do not have an ethical court. They now perform ceremonial functions while it still serves the purpose of the executive to bless their edicts with the adjective “Supreme.”
Commander Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo have exposed the coupling of our executive, legislative, and judicial branches. They have exposed the value of having dupes appointed justices of the court. Republicans too have been exposed as complicit. For most the duplicity is personal. Its about money. It is unlikely that Lisa Murkowski ever held a principle that couldn’t be bought. Democrats control electoral processes in Alaska and showed that they can put anyone the chose into office. The guarantees in the Declaration and the Constitution are now impressive sounding slogans with no recourse of an honorable court to resolve departures from our core of law.
The only path now is to assert the power of people, and that must start with undoing what George Soros and others undertook before we understood the consequences of not having verifiable elections. We have no way of knowing how people vote, and both parties have failed to insist. Soros funded Acorn years ago, and the Secretary of State Project to help take away representation of and by the people. We haven’t a clue how people really vote. While there may still be a few local precincts with party oversight, paper ballots, and hand counts, they are a small minority. No other mechanism today would satisfy a court’s chain of evidence requirement, or our FDA’s audit trail requirements for drug certification (from personal experience).
After overcoming Acorn and Soros’ Sec. of State. project, and the corruption in most every SEIU administered state election office, we must vet every candidate for adherence to the Constitution, and remove him if they fails. Then we can replace federal and Supreme Court Justices because they have a sworn duty to address violations of the Constitution. The Senate can remove Justices. Federal judges are political appointees. The sudden appearance of a Russian- Educated attorney from the firm of Obama’s Senior Council, Robert Bauer, into the office a federal judge Carter who had promised discovery stinks - it is the appearance of corruption. Carter violated a witnessed promise of discovery if Orly Taitz would forgo her right to discovery since the Government Attorneys had not responded to a properly filed complaint. He lied, probably under duress.
Obama is in violation of the Constitution, having been born a British subject. Every justice is aware of this. Supreme Court justices have grounds for original jurisdiction. They can’t question elections, but they can question a violation of Constitutional eligibility. Roberts, who took three tries to administer the oath of office, understands this, and should be impeached. Only Justice Thomas has acknowledged the Court’s intransigence.
So jamese777, you are correct. Republicans knew, and protected McCain, because Hillary would surely be president if McCain were exposed late in the election cycle. It would be interesting to know who informed every Republican that they must keep quiet about Obama’s ineligibility. Republicans, understandably, didn’t have the stomach to remove McCain themselves during the primaries, even though some smart Democrats had spelled out his eligibility problems clearly. An amendment or clarification should make foreign-born children of military citizens eligible, but it hasn’t yet happened. The latest to try were Claire McCaskill and Barack Obama in SB 2678 in Feb of 2008.
And you are correct about Roberts. What do they have on Roberts? Was he the holdout? He knew before he administered the oath that Obama was in violation of Article II Section 1, and thus lied when he was sworn. The two Obama appointees should have recused themselves, but there is no law that I know of governing recusal. That they know the words from Minor v. Happersett, and have not done their duty is misprision - seldom used, but appropriate, just as natural born citizenship is a seldom used definition.
Don’t leave out the House of Representatives though, the vote on the Resolution celebrating the 50th anniversary of Hawaii statehood which contained the statement: “Birthplace of the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama” was 378-0.
Now if only you could convince any single judge at any level of the judiciary in America of your legal theory....but alas....
By the way, Sotomayor and Kagan (and Bader-Ginsberg and Breuer as well) are irrelevant to granting Kerchner-Apuzzo’s Petition as the Supreme Court operates under “the rule of four.” It only takes four of the nine justices to agree to hear a case meaning that from among Alito, Roberts, Kennedy, Scalia and Thomas, the birtherbots can’t find four Justices to agree to hear an Obama eligibility case.
I am just guessing but my money is on even the conservative, originalist Justices agreeing with a former Republican state Senator from Georgia who was nominated to be a federa judge by Senator Saxby Chambliss and who was appointed to the federal judiciary by George W. Bush and who wrote the following in dismissing an Obama eligibilty lawsuit and who imposed a $20,000 fine on the birther attorney in that suit for wasting the judge’s time with nonsense: “A spurious claim questioning the President’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that it so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”—US District Court Judge for the Middle District of Georgia Clay R. Land
I’ll conclude with a little more grist for the conspiracy theory mill: since 2001, George Soros (and Teresa Kerry) have been major financial contributors to John McCain’s Reform Institute foundation.
Is it possible that George Soros actually chose the Republican opponent to run against Obama by insuring that McCain had more campaign funds than the other Republican candidates?