Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
the Constitution gives no role to the courts in deciding whether a president was properly elected.

This is true but two points must be made:

1. The issue is not whether Barry was "properly elected" but whether or not he is qualified.

2. SCOTUS broke that rule when they interfered in the 2000 election.

Vis-a-vis point 2, just has they took up an improper role in 2000, here they are abdicating their proper role, by refusing to hear whether or not a candidate is properly qualified, something the courts have done before for officeholders.

70 posted on 11/30/2010 5:55:45 PM PST by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Plummz

BO’s fraud in getting nominated and elected is the issue.

The BO crisis will not be resolved until BO and his co-conspirators are indicted. Once BO’s crimes are exposed then SCOTUS will have to order him legally removed.

http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320


105 posted on 12/01/2010 7:25:06 AM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson