Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoyt-clagwell
“As someone who has been in the health insurance business for 30+ years the pre-ex clause and allowing kids to stay on their parents plan are good measures.”

Then you do not know beans about insurance. Insurance is for future events—not pre-exising conditions. If you make insurance companies take people with pre-existing conditions, that is no longer insurance and lots of folks will just not get insurance until they have to get insurnace (i.e., they get sick and have a pre-exising condition).

120 posted on 11/30/2010 11:10:24 AM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: HwyChile
Then you do not know beans about insurance. Insurance is for future events—not pre-exising conditions. If you make insurance companies take people with pre-existing conditions, that is no longer insurance and lots of folks will just not get insurance until they have to get insurnace (i.e., they get sick and have a pre-exising condition).

I said people need to have an incentive to purchase coverage before they get the pre-ex condition. I understand the ramifications fully if people can take out coverage after coming down with a sickness or accident.

Insurance is for future events—not pre-exising conditions.

I remember the days when a newborn baby had to be enrolled and accepted for coverage...and the baby could be declined. How would you like to be parents of a newborn and be subject to $100,000's of thousands of cost because the baby was born with a severe medical problem? It would suck and it happened..a lot. Laws made many years ago prohibit this. Carriers have to accept a newborn no matter what the health conditionas are (not the same as the 18 year old clause).

This whole pre-ex is more complicated than you make it appear. It's not all cut and dried.

129 posted on 11/30/2010 11:21:25 AM PST by hoyt-clagwell (5:00 AM Gym Crew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: HwyChile

RE: “As someone who has been in the health insurance business for 30+ years the pre-ex clause and allowing kids to stay on their parents plan are good measures.”

AND............

“Then you do not know beans about insurance. Insurance is for future events—not pre-exising conditions. If you make insurance companies take people with pre-existing conditions, that is no longer insurance and lots of folks will just not get insurance until they have to get insurnace (i.e., they get sick and have a pre-exising condition).”

****************

I agree with YOU! Newbie “clagwell” isn’t impressing me with his knowledge of health insurance, despite his claim of 30 years of experience. I worked for Blue Cross for many years myself, much of the time in Legal —
I’ve seen it all —

Allowing pre-existing conditions and allowing ‘kids’ (HA!) to stay on parent’s policy until age 26 are NOT good ideas!


162 posted on 11/30/2010 12:04:23 PM PST by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson