Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker
"having the Secretary of State explicitly detail it, sign it, and mailbomb it under such low security clearance that a PFC could steal it and upload it to the Net, would establish that SoS as "ridiculously stupid and dangerously naive"? "

Really, you should just keep your mouth shut. Every time I read one of your posts, you more completely confirm my suspicions of you.

Do yourself a favor, and google SIPRnet. After that, take this week's paycheck and buy yourself a clue, sport.

57 posted on 11/30/2010 4:31:39 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand
Really, you should just keep your mouth shut. Every time I read one of your posts, you more completely confirm my suspicions of you. Do yourself a favor, and google SIPRnet. After that, take this week's paycheck and buy yourself a clue, sport.

Suspicions? LOL. I have no suspicions about you - your posts make you perfectly clear.

The cables were classified SECRET/NOFORN, and both the SIPR and NIPR nets STILL allow machines with flashdrive ports and CD-ROM burners. The use of such low security for such politically damaging information was either rank incompetence, or more Clinton treason.

Which utterly damning, ever-repeated Hillary screwup explanation do YOU prefer, sport?

59 posted on 11/30/2010 4:43:33 PM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson