Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ENERGY: How to prep your home for an electric car
nctimes.com ^

Posted on 11/28/2010 5:18:31 PM PST by Jet Jaguar

Edited on 11/28/2010 6:07:20 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

Getting your home ready to charge an electric car will either require little time or money ---- or a couple of months and thousands of dollars. It depends on what kind of electric car you buy, the wiring in your home and how quickly you want to juice your ride.


(Excerpt) Read more at nctimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: efv; electricity; energy; missinglink; recharging
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: Jet Jaguar

So will there be power, with this new, HUGE demand (assuming that people really do start driving these POS’s)?

Yep - DEFINITELY. Any time you turn on a light switch there will be power. There will be no blackouts, and there will be no increased capacity to speak of, despite growing population and now these POS’s.

How does that miracle get accomplished? It’s called “Smart Meters”. They will price power so high, during high demand that people will simply stop using it. Us Texans will soon have a choice, 85F in our homes during the summer, or $2,000 dollar power bills. So, yes, if you can spare $2,000 a month, you can keep running your AC like nothing ever happened. If not, prepare to sweat, and sweat big.


121 posted on 11/28/2010 7:25:41 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“OK, so electrics are hybrids — only 45% coal-powered (LOL).”

Yes, which makes them three times as efficient in burning fossil fuels as gasoline powered cars. I don’t see that as a problem.


122 posted on 11/28/2010 7:26:29 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ully2

Wow ! I feel sorry for you. Your neighborhood has those pesky transformers that cannot be replaced with higher capacity models ?! That sucks.

If only you had an electric company that had some reason, like extra revenue from more electricity sold, to replace those transformers. If only there was something called “profit motive” or “free markets” that would allow a company to invest in new equipment when it sees an opportunity for additional revenues. /s


123 posted on 11/28/2010 7:33:14 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Depends on your electric rate per KWH and how much charging you need to do in 8 hours. If that 8 hours is to let you drive 40 miles per day, and your electric rate is 10 cents per kwh, then the daily cost would be about a dollar.


124 posted on 11/28/2010 7:35:44 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

66kwhs would not get you 100 miles. It would get you 250 miles. So your cost would be under $0.0265 per mile.


125 posted on 11/28/2010 7:41:34 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: crz

The Tesla can cover 250 miles on a charge. With the right charger and grid improvements, it could be recharged in an hour and drive another 250 miles.

Of course, a battery pack that large is expensive and a waste of money for somebody that regularly drives less than 40 miles per day and sleeps hours per day when the car can be easily recharged from a regular outlet.

From this data, you decide that the government is trying to force people into staying is cities or use mass transit for long distances ? I think you are reading too much into things. The tinfoil in your hat may be getting a little thin. Time to add another layer.


126 posted on 11/28/2010 7:46:43 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I understand what regenerative braking is...I just used it to counter the argument that there are no moving parts on an electric car. I suspect there are indeed some moving parts involved with switching from freewheel coasting to having the wheels engage the generator when the brakes are applied. Just one example.


127 posted on 11/28/2010 7:49:57 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I’ll buy a pogo stick before I ever buy a hybrid or an electric car.


128 posted on 11/28/2010 8:02:11 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (''I don't regret setting bombs,I feel we didn't do enough.'' ->Bill Ayers,Hussein's mentor,9/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer

“brake pads, rotors,”

Actually, if braking loads are primarily regenerative, the rotors and pads last much longer. They likely would not need to be replaced in under 400,000 miles.


129 posted on 11/28/2010 8:05:48 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Gas / Electric Vehicle Cost Calculator
The production and distribution of gasoline is a very efficient process, whereas generation of electricity is a relatively inefficient one (about 92% and 39%, respectively). Because internal combustion (ICE) vehicles are themselves so inefficient, only about 15%, the overall efficiency (i.e. generation to charging to vehicle use) of an electric vehicle can still be almost twice that of an ICE vehicle. Regardless, changes in the supply and demand curves for motive fuel are likely to change prices from what they are now. Still, it's not hard to imagine world demand for petroleum expanding at an unsustainable rate.
130 posted on 11/28/2010 8:10:49 PM PST by zinder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Most people now have programmable thermostats and the AC shuts down after midnight or so. Likewise, a charger can be programmed to come on in the middle of the night rather than immediately when plugged in, so there is no time both appliances are on at once. At your 5000 watt rate, it would only need to charge for two hours to replenish the charge to drive 40 miles.


131 posted on 11/28/2010 8:13:41 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
since i would guess most of the people buying these things will live in the city, where will they plug in???
132 posted on 11/28/2010 8:16:08 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Total insanity....


133 posted on 11/28/2010 8:16:14 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789
Actually, if braking loads are primarily regenerative, the rotors and pads last much longer. They likely would not need to be replaced in under 400,000 miles.

While I'm certain that regenerative braking could reduce loading on the regular braking system, I seriously doubt that it would become the primary braking source. Heck, I can bring my Honda down from 80 to about 5 mph purely by downshifting and relying on engine compression to slow the vehicle down, but that approach isn't practical for the most part. 400,000 is a stretch - 80,000 maybe. If you drive in a manner that takes the greatest advantage of the regenerative system.

134 posted on 11/28/2010 8:16:45 PM PST by meyer (Hey Obama - It's the end of the world as you know it.... ..... and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Chode

At work or Walgreens for some.

Press keyword recharging for more articles.


135 posted on 11/28/2010 8:19:33 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789

We shall see. Here in Texas during the summer you run air conditioners all night...and they only slow down around midnight (i.e., cycle less). I’m not sure about the 2 hours either - the Leaf was 8 hours, the other cars were 4 hours (at 240 volts).


136 posted on 11/28/2010 8:20:17 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

“3300 watts X 8 hours is 26400 watts , 26.4 KWH”

That much electricity would let you drive 100 miles. You’re going to do that every day ? A gasoline vehicle of similar size would require at least 4 gallons of gas every day, or $360/mo in gas. As I said, even at peak rates of 31 cents per kwh (socal Edison Tier 5), that’s only $251 so it is still cheaper than gasoline would be to drive the same distance.


137 posted on 11/28/2010 8:23:57 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
i guess i was thinking more about at night...

parking garages or with the odd even parking you can't always run a line to the car if it's on the other side of the street and such

138 posted on 11/28/2010 8:33:37 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
I'm more in favor of a hydraulic motor powered car with an accumulator for power storage than a battery powered car. We have cars that get 35+mpg right now, so a car that uses stored power is basically the next step. My daughter gets 38-39mpg right now with a 1999 Cougar sick shift. And it blows the doors off many cars today for power. We had a 50mpg diesel Rabbit several years ago. I just don't see the advantage of electric cars unless they get more mpg’s in a larger car. If you are going to get 40mpg in a roller skate that costs $40k, I don't get it. Back in the 70’s, I saw a car that could pull a dump truck that got 60+mpg invented by a couple of NASA engineers. It was on CBS News and pulled the truck down Seawall Blvd. smoking the tires on an old Volvo. The car was bought by a company in Alvin Texas and never heard from again. This technology is not new and is used in many pieces of heavy equipment. Ford is working on an Expedition with this power. Many trucks use it today. UPS has trucks using it right now. There is absolutely NO media on it. Everything is “electric” and “battery”. You have no batteries to discard and n electrical load to deal with. All it does is store the energy from a gas or diesel engine in an accumulator and release it into a hydraulic motor. Coasting or braking refills the accumulator. Easy. cheap, and off the shelf tech.

Oh, and as a plus, power is practically unlimited and available instantly. Releasing 3000 lbs of pressure to a motor, the tires WILL move and it will "charge" back up in seconds, not hours. As the power is not needed, the motor will go to idle or even shut off. Max mileage will shut the engine down, but it may be more practical to idle to keep the air, power steering, ect running.

139 posted on 11/28/2010 8:38:45 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Premise; US is a dangerous polluter and we need to stop burning oil and coal.

Premise is false, so no need to go further. Go visit China, India, and Russia. Nasty green stench cloud air. Public workers wear masks, and die at 40.

Nixon solved the US air quality and pollution problem 40 years ago. I've seen nothing but blue skies and zero smog in the US for decades.

"Solution" Electric cars - cheaper, less pollution.

Both statements preposterous. Requires countless more coal plants. Without even discussing impracticality of a 40 mile car with zero infrastructure....ask anyone in the car business. You can't sell these cars new - they depreciate 50% the day you leave the lot. (15-20K). Most dealers will refuse to take them in on trade, unless far below blue book value.

140 posted on 11/28/2010 8:48:21 PM PST by T. Jefferson (Batton down the hatches, full speed in reverse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson