To: Baynative
I don't mean to offend you, but it sounds a bit like the liberals to say you only want to talk with people who agree with you.It's impossible for the Palin Protectorate NOT to be offended by any type of criticism of her. The PP take personal offense at anything other than abject adoration of Palin which is what worries me.
43 posted on
11/27/2010 1:24:34 PM PST by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: raybbr
“The PP take personal offense at anything other than abject adoration of Palin which is what worries me.”
Though I like Sarah a great deal, this concerns me as well.
I have made no decisions yet....and cannot...until a fair discussion of the pros and cons of all official candidates takes place.
Those who are not fans of ANY conservative would certainly LOVE to divide us all...and/or shut down intelligent debate to prevent us from reaching the best outcome.
61 posted on
11/27/2010 1:37:14 PM PST by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: raybbr
which is what worries me.
Your 'concern' is noted. And clinton feels your pain so go and 'adore' him - since only liberals use those words.
170 posted on
11/27/2010 2:36:34 PM PST by
presently no screen name
("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
To: raybbr
It's impossible for the Palin Protectorate NOT to be offended by any type of criticism of her.Your remark wasn't Palinistically Correct.
275 posted on
11/27/2010 4:13:24 PM PST by
Mojave
(Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson