Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and More
TorrentFreak ^ | November 26, 2010 | enigmax

Posted on 11/27/2010 11:43:16 AM PST by PhilosopherStone1000

Following on the heels of this week’s domain seizure of a large hiphop file-sharing links forum, it’s clear today that the U.S. Government has been very busy. Without any need for COICA, ICE has just seized the domain of a BitTorrent meta-search engine along with those belonging to other music linking sites and several others which appear to be connected to physical counterfeit goods.

While complex, it’s still possible for U.S. authorities and copyright groups to point at a fully-fledged BitTorrent site with a tracker and say “that’s an infringing site.” When one looks at a site which hosts torrents but operates no tracker, the finger pointing becomes quite a bit more difficult.

When a site has no tracker, carries no torrents, lists no copyright works unless someone searches for them and responds just like Google, accusing it of infringement becomes somewhat of a minefield – unless you’re ICE Homeland Security Investigations that is.

This morning, visitors to the Torrent-Finder.com site are greeted with an ominous graphic which indicates that ICE have seized the site’s domain.

(Excerpt) Read more at torrentfreak.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
List of seized domains at 75+

2009jerseys.com 51607.com amoyhy.com b2corder.com bishoe.com borntrade.com borntrade.net boxedtvseries.com boxset4less.com boxsetseries.com burberryoutletshop.com cartoon77.com cheapscarfshop.com coachoutletfactory.com dajaz1.com discountscarvesonsale.com dvdcollectionsale.com dvdcollects.com dvdorderonline.com dvdprostore.com dvdscollection.com dvdsetcollection.com dvdsetsonline.com dvdsuperdeal.com eluxury-outlet.com getdvdset.com gofactoryoutlet.com golfstaring.com golfwholesale18.com handbag9.com handbagcom.com handbagspop.com icqshoes.com ipodnanouk.com jersey-china.com jerseyclubhouse.com jordansbox.com lifetimereplicas.com louis-vuitton-outlet-store.com lv-outlets.com lv-outlets.net lv-outletstore.com massnike.com merrytimberland.com mycollects.com mydreamwatches.com mygolfwholesale.com newstylerolex.com nfljerseysupply.com nibdvd.com odvdo.com oebags.com onsmash.com overbestmall.com rapgodfathers.com realtimberland.com rmx4u.com scarfonlineshop.com scarfviponsale.com shawls-store.com silkscarf-shop.com silkscarfonsale.com skyergolf.com sohob2b.com sohob2c.com storeofeast.com stuff-trade.com sunglasses-mall.com sunogolf.com tbl-sports.com throwbackguy.com tiesonsale.com timberlandlike.com topabuy.com torrent-finder.com usaburberryscarf.com usaoutlets.net

"A spokeswoman for ICE confirmed the seizures in the following statement. “ICE office of Homeland Security Investigations executed court-ordered seizure warrants against a number of domain names. As this is an ongoing investigation, there are no additional details available at this time.”"

Question for any attorneys here:while it is illegal to sell counterfeit goods and it is illegal to purchase illegal goods, by what law is it illegal to answer a question about where counterfeit goods might be found? Is it illegal to advertize counterfeit goods? Particularly when the goods are advertized as being counterfeit? And since when can a judge simply issue a warrent to shut down a site without first having a trial?

I suggest that my fellow FReepers get the real e-mail address of at least two other FReepers so we can regroup when Dumb0's thought police come next for Free Republic.

1 posted on 11/27/2010 11:43:19 AM PST by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

Well, the ICE+DHS have just become the BATFE of the internet. Any freepers work for the afore-mentioned “agencies”? Should quit now before you have to writhe in embarrassment as your superiors wrap themselves in gov’t issue toilet paper to celebrate their “accomplishments”....


2 posted on 11/27/2010 11:52:21 AM PST by no-s (B.L.O.A.T. and every day...because some day soon they won't be making any more...for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

So much for innocent until proven guilty. Back to the old ways we left Europe for.


3 posted on 11/27/2010 11:53:42 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000
Photobucket

Photobucket

4 posted on 11/27/2010 11:54:26 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000
I suggest that my fellow FReepers get the real e-mail address of at least two other FReepers so we can regroup when Dumb0's thought police come next for Free Republic.

We should all send our real emails to Jim so he can notify all of us what is the next step!

5 posted on 11/27/2010 12:03:43 PM PST by blondee123 (IMPEACH THEM ALL! FREEDOMS SLIPPING AWAY DAILY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

If things weren’t scary a few months ago, then they certainly are now.


6 posted on 11/27/2010 12:10:42 PM PST by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000
The seizing of domains, so far as I can tell, is simply a redirecting of name servers. They're working with registrars to redirect nameservers to their own choice. For example, torrent-finder.info is still live, has the same information, and is at the same ip address as torrent-finder.com used to be.

If this is their manner of seizing domains, it's about as lazy as it can get, probably requires little court intervention (since it is the registrars they're working with), and overall, pretty easy to get around (just direct your DNS to a name server who has the archived IP addresses.)

All in all, they're setting the stage for a dual level internet, where you use outlaw DNS servers to access the websites the government doesn't want you to see, then flop back to regular ones before you do your banking or other legal activity.

7 posted on 11/27/2010 12:18:46 PM PST by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

ts only fasicm when Bush did it.


8 posted on 11/27/2010 12:19:40 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000
Well, thank goodness that ICE is doing something useful, like shutting down web sites, rather than wasting their time, trying to track down illegal alien criminals and potential terrorists!

Mark

9 posted on 11/27/2010 12:20:47 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

So why don’t they do this with WikiLeaks.com?


10 posted on 11/27/2010 12:21:05 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
I get that. But there is nothing that I can find in any of the statutes cited in the ICE image on the redirected page that says that DHS can commandeer someones property (the domain name) without due process.

The statutes supplied talk about “trafficking in counterfeits” and “attempted transactions”, nowhere do they have authority to act pre-emptively. They can seize anything used in the transaction or attempted transaction but only after a trial.

11 posted on 11/27/2010 12:24:09 PM PST by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Because Bambi cares more about his large Hollywood donors than he does about American Service Men and Women? Just a thought.


12 posted on 11/27/2010 12:26:10 PM PST by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

Actually, it appears that it’s part of the TOS for godaddy.com and networksolutions that they will comply with a federal agency in countering the theft of intellectual property. Whereas Wikileaks.org isn’t registered with either registrar.


13 posted on 11/27/2010 12:28:48 PM PST by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Wow, I really wish I knew what you were talking about.
I think I need your knowledge when the poo hits the fan.


14 posted on 11/27/2010 12:34:49 PM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000
They are going bonkers over at DU about this. They ALSO SEE this as the government taking over our freedoms!

Scary thought that DU agrees with us on something, but they are questioning everything now & condeming the government for having too much control in our lives!!!!!

15 posted on 11/27/2010 12:37:23 PM PST by blondee123 (IMPEACH THEM ALL! FREEDOMS SLIPPING AWAY DAILY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

Meanwhile the real threats are getting their backs wet crossing the Rio Grande to come
here to steal our tax dollars and rape our people.

Typical leftist idiocy.


16 posted on 11/27/2010 12:58:03 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000

I’m confused? I’m not in favor of websites that encourage copyright infringement, but where does ICE get legal authority to seize these sites under existing law?

The Senate Judiciary Committee passed COICA Nov 18, but Sen Ron Wyden said he will block a Senate floor vote. There isn’t a similar bill in the house. COICA is not law only it’s only S.3804 passes out of committee. Plus COICA’s enforcement if passed would be DOJ as written; from text S.3804: Requires the AG to maintain a public listing of domain names that the Department of Justice (DOJ) determines are dedicated to infringing activities but for which the AG has not filed an action. Allows parties to petition the AG to remove such a domain name from the list and obtain judicial review of the final determination in a civil action

The article I read referred to COICA violation re these websites. COICA has not passed, its not law, and doesn’t appear to be likely to pass this year.

What law is ICE enforcing?


17 posted on 11/27/2010 1:07:17 PM PST by veritas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas3

>> I’m not in favor of websites that encourage copyright infringement

Neither am I.

>> but where does ICE get legal authority to seize these sites under existing law?

go to http://www.torrent-finder.com and read the notice. They got a warrant in U. S. District Court. All of the applicable laws are given by number, for your researching pleasure.

>> What law is ICE enforcing?

Again: go to the link. The specific laws they are enforcing are spelled out by U. S. C. number.


18 posted on 11/27/2010 1:39:23 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Thanks for the link. Just wondering since I couldn’t find it anywhere.


19 posted on 11/27/2010 1:46:49 PM PST by veritas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStone1000
You have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency, according to John McCain. In reality we apparently do.


20 posted on 11/27/2010 2:12:12 PM PST by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson