Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holding Sarah Palin to Her Promise
American Thinker ^ | 11/27/10 | Robert Eugene Simmons Jr.

Posted on 11/27/2010 11:27:05 AM PST by American Dream 246

In a recent interview, Sarah Palin said to the interviewer that she will consider running for president if there is no one willing to do the job and take on the problems facing America. I think America is going to have to hold her to that promise.

I can't think of a reason why Palin would want to be president and move to Washington. She clearly loves Alaska and has a wonderful family who also love Alaska as home. Palin clearly has a good thing going with the influence she has on national politics and election cycles. On a personal level, she has been able to amass a small fortune in being who she is. I don't begrudge her the fortune, and I don't blame her for her love of the wild beauty of Alaska.

I can't think of a single reason she would want to move to an urban environment often choked with crime and poverty. I can't think of a good reason why she should want even more scrutiny into her life and her doings with her children and submit to being organized 24 hours a day. I can't think of why she would want to brave the wall of vitriol that would come from the left as well as many Republican establishment types. Make no mistake that if she does run for president, you can expect every rude, misogynistic, and disgusting word in several languages to be thrown her way.

In fact, there is only one reason I can ask Sarah Palin to brave the sewers of a presidential run. The reason is that we need her.

The brutal reality of America is that an aristocracy has developed in Washington against the wishes of the founders of this country. The Republican Party "insiders" are just as deep in the corruption and aristocratic thinking as the liberal elites. If anyone ever needed convincing of the deep disregard in which the aristocracy holds the serfs, the "insiders'" reaction to the Tea Party movement answered that question. In such an atmosphere of aristocratic minds, who else would be able to cut them down to size and remind them that they work for the people of America? Would Romney, with his own aristocratic flair and his own version of Obamacare, be willing to curtail the reach of the aristocrats into our lives? Would politician-turned-talk show host Huckabee be willing to rein in the very people who supported him in his political life? Sarah Palin is one of few politicians who have fearlessly taken on the establishment, both Democrat and Republican, with a consistent message about the enforcement of the constitution and the returning of government to the people.

However, the need to curtail the aristocracy isn't the only issue that drives the need for President Palin. There are other lesser-known politicians who have taken on the establishment, such as Chris Christie. However, only Palin has shown the charisma and powerful speaking skills that can pack an auditorium to a sold-out crowd ten minutes after announcement. Unlike Obama, Palin is an old-style speaker, referring to her notes and adding in her own personal touches. She doesn't usually need a teleprompter because she believes what she says. Most politicians, on the other hand, say what they feel is popular at the time; their speeches are carefully prepared by experts and preened to play to the latest polling data. Palin is a rare person in politics who speaks from the heart.

Mrs. Palin also has a unique trait that comes with few politicians of our time. That is the ability to see that the law is done regardless of her personal beliefs. Personally, I am an agnostic and libertarian, and when I see that she vetoed a law that denied benefits to same-sex couples in Alaska -- not because of her religious beliefs, but because it was unconstitutional according to the Alaskan constitution -- I stand up and cheer. A governor putting her beliefs first would approve the law and take their chances with the court, but Palin chose the novel path of obeying her oath of office. A president is a servant of the people charged with enforcing the constitution and protecting the people from all enemies of the USA. It is not for the president or a governor to "interpret" or otherwise circumvent the law. When asked about the veto, Palin responded that if people wish to change the constitution, then there is a process for that.

While Mrs. Palin is a deeply religious woman, she doesn't try to press that on the rest of us. I can go to see her speak and leave comfortably feeling that my agnostic conservative friends are not being marginalized. This is something I can't say about other major conservative public figures such as Glenn Beck. Although I have many beliefs in common with Beck, when he goes on the religious tangent, I am left feeling very uncomfortable in my agnosticism, as if those of us who are conservative agnostic or perhaps atheists are lacking in morality. On the other hand, Mrs. Palin manages to inject her religious beliefs into her speech without inspiring offense or implying moral superiority over those of other views.

Another trait that sets Mrs. Palin aside from the rest of the pack is her devotion to America. Mrs. Palin speaks with pride and joy about the unique place that is the United States of America. I can't see her cutting down our troops, declaring our culpability for the world's woes, or berating the people of America for being stupid, or throwing a tantrum, as others in the media and politics have done. Palin would be a strong figure in international politics and a tough president to those who would do America harm. Palin is utterly fearless, willing to take on her own party, the other party, the Federal Reserve, and anyone else who needs to be taken on to forward the interest of America.

Finally, Mrs. Palin is an intelligent and savvy person. The liberal media and establishment Republicans have spent two years trying to alternately paint her as stupid or Machiavellian. They can't seem to make up their mind whether she is smart and evil or dumb and incredibly lucky. Neither strategy has worked. As Palin's knowledge of policy, economics, and government has grown, so has the counter-story being put out by the establishment. Thanks to the internet, people can look up Palin's past, listen to her speeches, and examine her record; the need to rely on the "big three" news services has been supplanted by the internet. Furthermore, on those same sites, Palin's foes have been revealed as nasty, misogynistic, and potentially violent people. Through just being Palins, Palin and her family have exposed the hatred of the left,

I won't be a bit surprised if Sarah Palin doesn't particularly want to be president, and I can think of a million reasons why she would not want to run. However, I cant imagine anyone else who would be able to pull us out of the mess we are in, reign in the aristocracy, encourage our allies, intimidate our enemies, and believe what she says while doing it all. President Palin wouldn't merely encourage young women by being the first female president; she would be a great president. Palin is not Reagan, but she could be just as great as Reagan.

I am sorry, Sarah Palin, but we need you to serve -- and for that, we need you to run.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012president; obama; palin; palinaccomplishments; sarahpalin; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: neefer
You give her way too much credit.

She has the most successful electioneering/endorsing record in history as far as I know. It is difficult to give her too much credit.

81 posted on 11/27/2010 1:32:46 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

Mitch Daniels called for a surrender on “social issues”.

Governor Palin held to an Alaskan constitutional issue and at the same time supported a ballot initiative to block benefits for same sex couples.


82 posted on 11/27/2010 1:38:36 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
You hold her on a very high pedestal. I'm trying to shed a realistic light. She can easily win the nomination but I'm not sure about the general election. If she does win the Presidency, getting things done in DC is a lot different than Anchorage.
83 posted on 11/27/2010 1:40:45 PM PST by neefer (Big city turn me loose and set me free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: neefer
You hold her on a very high pedestal. I'm trying to shed a realistic light.

Don't start that BS, you are telling untruths, and I am clearing it up with facts, it would be another lie from you to say what you just said.

84 posted on 11/27/2010 1:44:33 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
It's all about the electoral map and the swing states Obama won last time. Which ones will he keep? And which ones will send him packing?

Virginia
North Carolina
Ohio
Indiana
Florida
Colorado
New Mexico
Iowa
Nevada





85 posted on 11/27/2010 1:44:46 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: neefer
"Alright then, why not Bobby Jindal? Is he too soft on social issues for you?"

Jindal's performance as Louisiana governor has been less than stellar. I once had high hopes for him, as his actions during Katrina seemed to indicate excellent leadership qualities, but I see none of that from his governship.

Note. I'm originally from Louisiana, lived and worked there until 1996, and have followed Jindal from his first steps in politics with Mike Foster. IMO, Palin towers over Jindal like the Louisiana capital building does over the statue of Huey Long in front of it.

86 posted on 11/27/2010 1:48:36 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Because the “my way or the highway” attitude is gone. He seems soft in the latest interviews. He's mentioned his shellacking numerous times (most recently when pardoning a turkey). He offered to meet with newly elected Republicans well before they take office (although they turned him down).
87 posted on 11/27/2010 1:49:03 PM PST by neefer (Big city turn me loose and set me free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: neefer
Because the “my way or the highway” attitude is gone. He seems soft in the latest interviews. He's mentioned his shellacking numerous times (most recently when pardoning a turkey). He offered to meet with newly elected Republicans well before they take office (although they turned him down).

As long as Obama vetoes repealing Obamacare he will remain firmly ensconced on the left.

88 posted on 11/27/2010 2:00:47 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
she vetoed a law that denied benefits to same-sex couples in Alaska

See ansel12's post #82.

Try not to LOL with your mouth full.

Please, no more "Truce on Social Issues" candidates such as Mitch Daniels.

89 posted on 11/27/2010 2:06:49 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
A pro abortion candidate will lose millions of votes.

I hope so and Obama should lose for sure in 2012 because he is for abortion on demand with zero restrictions. If that is not infanticide, I do not know what is.
90 posted on 11/27/2010 2:26:28 PM PST by Undocumented_capitalist (Obama is the killer in chief of every aborted fetus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You desperately need a course on English comprehension.


91 posted on 11/27/2010 2:30:59 PM PST by Undocumented_capitalist (Obama is the killer in chief of every aborted fetus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Undocumented_capitalist

You desperately need to quit pushing your pro-abortion, pro-homosexual agenda.

Do you realize that everyone can read your short posting history?


92 posted on 11/27/2010 2:32:45 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: neefer

One more time....

Mitch Daniels is a RINO who openly rejects social conservative issues.

No thanks!!!!


93 posted on 11/27/2010 2:43:24 PM PST by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

How can I put you on ignore? And I would appreciate if you put me on ignore.


94 posted on 11/27/2010 2:48:37 PM PST by Undocumented_capitalist (Obama is the killer in chief of every aborted fetus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Undocumented_capitalist

This is a pro-life site nooby, your pro-abortion efforts will not be ignored.


95 posted on 11/27/2010 2:51:59 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: neefer

So you believe Obama is eligible to be President? Also, the presidency has not become a popularity contest, but you need money and crowds....No one is going to see Jindal or Pence...get real


96 posted on 11/27/2010 3:20:25 PM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the sons (and daughters) of liberty!!!! SP4P2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Don’t start that BS, you are telling untruths, and I am clearing it up with facts, it would be another lie from you to say what you just said.


BS yourself. Over here when I said Sarah wouldn’t run unless nobody else stepped up: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2633534/posts?q=1&;page=101 you answered me:

That isn’t what she said, and how is Romney, not a “hurl”, but Huckabee is, and your personal preference is the less than conservative Rick Perry?

Palin is the choice of conservatives, and the four that you just named are not “credible”.


That IS what she said, and that’s what this thread is about.


97 posted on 11/27/2010 3:44:39 PM PST by txhurl (If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246
Too many words. Keep It Simple Stupid.

President Palin wouldn't merely encourage young women by being the first female president; she would be a great president. Palin is not Reagan, but she could be just as great as Reagan.

Agreed.

98 posted on 11/27/2010 3:47:32 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

What in the world does dragging that other thread over here have to do with anything.

My post to you was exactly correct over there, and it has nothing to do with this thread.

If you want to post to me on that other thread do so, but do not hijack threads by towing one around and posting it on other threads and attempting to take up that conversation again.


99 posted on 11/27/2010 3:55:27 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You called me a liar when I said Sarah wouldn’t run unless nobody else stepped up to the plate. This thread refutes your charge.


100 posted on 11/27/2010 4:02:24 PM PST by txhurl (If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson