Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I heard my gay liberal niece say the other day that the reason the Dems lost is because Obama had become a Republican lap dog by abandoning his liberal roots. WOW!
1 posted on 11/27/2010 5:03:16 AM PST by fuzzybutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fuzzybutt
... pulling on the president's shirttails to make sure that he doesn't move from center-right to far-right,"

There they go claiming to be to the right when they are actually far left of communists.

Anyway I will believe the likes of Pelosi as soon as I see this:

Photobucket

2 posted on 11/27/2010 5:09:38 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt
For the likes of Rep. Higgins, politics is not the art of the possible but the purity of the ideology. And yet the press never tires of telling us that the Tea Partiers insisted on ideological purity in selecting candidates this year.
The biggest problem in America is the lack of a free and fair press. All other problems stem from that.
3 posted on 11/27/2010 5:12:06 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

Lesson learned... have elections only in California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts...


4 posted on 11/27/2010 5:15:15 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

It is hoped that 2012 is worse than 2010 for Democrats and that their behavior and policies are recognized for the adolescent insanity that they are.

IMHO


5 posted on 11/27/2010 5:18:11 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt
the reason the Dems lost is because Obama had become a Republican lap dog by abandoning his liberal roots.

yeah....they all need to keep believing that.....it will lead them to more ruin.

6 posted on 11/27/2010 5:18:16 AM PST by Vaquero (Dont pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

This is great news. The Democrat party more firmly establishes itself as a leftist brand, which will be their launching pad in 2012.


7 posted on 11/27/2010 5:21:26 AM PST by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

He needs to jog REALLY HARD to the left and destroy the democrats forever.


8 posted on 11/27/2010 5:25:24 AM PST by kennyboy509 (Let us eat cake too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

It is a truism of politics that you regard your position on the political spectrum as where everybody who has any sense should be. That being said, I, as a conservative, know that I am on the RIGHT side of that spectrum (in all senses) but at the same time I do not become so delusional as to think I am at the center as this moon-howling idiot, Rep.Woolsey, appears to think that she is.

My rational brain suggests that this comes from a fund-raising letter to her fellow Progressive-asylum residents. Rep. Woolsey [CA 6th] herself represents the Marin and Sonoma counties north of San Francisco, an area that voted 70% for Kerry and 76% for Obama. I may never buy another California Wine.

Given that California appears to be a mostly lost cause for the present, I weep softly for OUR FReeper friends who must bear the burdens of this Gold-to-Iron_Pyrite State. Sanity appears to have become the real rare substance there!


9 posted on 11/27/2010 5:28:35 AM PST by SES1066 (Thank you for your vote in November, now let us get to work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt
A river in Egypt.

5.56mm

10 posted on 11/27/2010 5:31:20 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

The argument that we must forcibly advance is both crystal clear and truthful: that the American people *rejected* the Democrat party’s *platform*, their *philosophy*, their *schemes*, and their *conniving*.

The American people are *not* “stupid” or “ill-informed” or “lied to” about what the Democrats did and were trying to do. In fact, the American people saw through the lies and deceit that the Democrats were using, and revolted against the stupidity, the waste, the arrogance, the greed, the lust for control, and the bitter burning hate that the Democrats forced on them.

The American people did not reject Democrat “personalities”, either, though almost inherently, the major Democrat “personalities” reflected their worst qualities. So fixing blame on one or more Democrats, such as Obama, Pelosi, and Reed, is just another excuse to try and protect their ideas.

It was not about *them*. It was about their stupid and arrogant *ideas*. It was about trying to push through socialism, or economic national socialism, while at the same time lying about it, that even though in every particular it was socialist or national socialist, pretending that it didn’t deserve those labels.

And only a fanatic ideologue believes that socialism or economic national socialism works. Yet they cling to these moribund philosophies like they cling to Keynesian-ism, thinking that debts never need to be repaid, and that prosperity comes from overspending and overtaxing.

And underneath it all there are filthy undercurrents of big city machine gangsterism, self-proclaimed pseudo-intellectual hereditary elitism, an utter contempt for constitutionalism, democracy, and republican-democracy, and a sneering hatred of America and American and religious values.

What’s left that anyone could like about their ideas? They are as repugnant as the worship of Moloch or Tloloc. In many cases they are even staggeringly anti-human. They pray for the extinction of billions of people through “natural means”, and failing that, they lust to kill both the elderly and infant, precisely because they cannot defend themselves.

Truthfully, I was shocked and appalled when, during Obama’s candidacy, there was some of the usual stupid banter about him being “the Antichrist”. One of his supporters finally admitted that he thought it would be a good thing if Obama was actually the Antichrist, because it would mean he was powerful, and could force through what his followers wanted. And even more importantly, he could hurt their mutual enemies, smite them, and make them suffer terribly.

Say what? What does it say about a person that they would embrace “ultimate evil”, even theoretically, they are so wrapped up in their own hate, greed and lust? It takes hypothetical evil and makes it very real.

A person like that should not be allowed to vote, because voting is part of the social contract, and if a person renounces the social contract to embrace “ultimate evil”, by about any standard they should lose their membership in society, including the “right” to vote.

This, too, is part of the horrible disease that are the ideas of the Democrat party. We should not let them pretend otherwise, though they would cast their very souls into Hell to force their will on the rest of us.


11 posted on 11/27/2010 5:37:22 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt

I do believe that if a Squirrel ran up Obama’s pant leg the Squirrel would come back empty handed. Ya I know I said it before but it’s true.


12 posted on 11/27/2010 6:33:24 AM PST by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzybutt
We think if he'd done less compromising in the last two years

Have I been in a coma for 2 years?

16 posted on 11/27/2010 7:02:11 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson