There was nothing odd in my statement. Unlike you, I won't lie for a candidate. I didn't tell lies about Romney, although I'm not going to argue THAT one with you since will just argue that differences of opinion are lies, and also we are banned from discussing and defense of Romney on this forum. Which may be why you keep pushing this, and bringing up other banned freepers. I'm still here.
As I said, your timeline is grossly exagerated. I actively defended Romney against what I believed were false attacks during 2007, and into early 2008. Once he dropped out, I only occasionally corrected false or incorrect statements when the statements themselves were important. I haven't defended Romney as a candidate since he dropped out. I didn't even argue for him as VP, and supported the Palin choice
Your lies here are how you earned your nickname from the anti-Romney crowd
How do YOU think I got the nickname? Didn't ejonesie22 give me that nickname (that's what another freeper just said on another thread, and you didn't object to that claim)? I said "It was a nickname assigned to me by another freeper; how is that a lie? I made NO comment on how I "earned" the name, your suggestion that I did is another lie.
And I see you still can't find any evidence for your claims, even though it should be easy for you if you aren't lying.
Let me help. Here's a thread: Cheney Mum on Palin's Qualifications
Oops, that's a pro-palin thread I posted
Wait, here's an attack comment: Post 20, "Sarah Palin: Newsweek"
Oops -- that's a comment where I agree Sarah Palin saying: "The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now". I did attack pro-palin people who posted pictures of Palin in a similarly sexist manner.
Here's one: COmment 20, "Media barred from recording or photographing Sarah Palin at Florida events": Oops, I DEFENDED her in that comment as well.
OK, here's one: COmment 46, "Ok, This needs to be said..(Message for Sarah Palin)"..... No wait, the thread attacked Palin, and I posted to defend her.
You lie saying that I am a well-known Palin basher. You call me an "anti-Palin troll". You post NO evidence. I can post link after link showing that I am NOT anti-Palin. But the real proof is found using search.
If you weren't lying, you would already have done what I just did, only posting the dozens of links that would show you weren't lying.
Instead, you post responses bringing up mormonism. I'm a Presbyterian.
I never said anything about your religion, I said that you are a romneybot that is a dedicated defender of Mitt Romney, and also Mormonism, that is part of every romneybots obligation and it is necessary to his candidacy among conservatives to strive cover him over that issue.
You go where ever Romney needs defending, and that includes defending Mormonism.
Just as defending Mormonism is a part of the Romney defense, attacking Palin is also, you do both.