Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom
but I don’t think there is any moral problem with insider trading. It is not fraud or stealing. It is just a matter of fairness.

You seem to be only considering the purchase of shares as opposed to the sale of them. Also, individuals in a position requiring fiduciary responsibility should not be permitted personal motive to intervene in any manner, it's destabilizing.

A wide open, no holds barred insider trading regime would be endless boom and bust with a very few profiting enormously and the market at large being completely wrecked. That is not in the interest of business or the society at large.

Do you see any problem with Chertoff being closely associated with the manufacturer of these controversial TSA security scanners? That represents a conflict of interest, and it is insider trading of a sort. It's not just a matter of "fairness," it's immoral precisely because it's fraudulent, and tantamount to stealing. It's malinvestment perpetrated for the individual gain of a few, foisted upon the entirety of the country, at a great cost in money, time and individual liberty.

16 posted on 11/25/2010 6:33:59 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry
A wide open, no holds barred insider trading regime would be endless boom and bust with a very few profiting enormously and the market at large being completely wrecked.

Just read about how the Randlords in South Africa concentrated ownership of goldmining and diamond mining at the expense of those with small lucrative holdings. And, interestingly, it was done on the London stock exchange.

21 posted on 11/25/2010 7:09:36 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson