Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

He is using that argument as a strawman as the court would only declare him ineligible. removing him would then be left up to congress.


311 posted on 11/27/2010 9:28:23 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]


To: antisocial

He is using that argument as a strawman as the court would only declare him ineligible. removing him would then be left up to congress.


You have merely parrotted what the judge actually said: “The process of removal of a sitting president-removal for any reason-IS WITHIN THE PROVINCE OF CONGRESS, NOT THE COURTS.”

There have now been eighty-five adjudicated lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility, including eight appeals that have reached the Supreme Court of the United States, none of them has found Obama to be ineligible. The ruling on the ninth appeal to reach the Supreme Court will be released on Monday.

A serious investigation of Obama’s eligibility would utilize either a grand jury investigation of Obama for fraud, election fraud or forgery or a congressional investigation; either of which would have subpoena power and the ability to compel witnesses to testify under oath.

Every major investigation of a presidential administration over the last sixty years used a grand jury; some examples: Nixon-Watergate, Reagan-Iran-Contra, Bush 41-Savings and Loan crisis, Clinton-Whitewater/Lewinsky-impeachment, Bush 43-CIA Leaks.


322 posted on 11/27/2010 11:07:50 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson