Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The discussion was about persons born to US parents overseas — specifically on US military bases. Yet you introduce persons born in the US in your last snide post.

Do you have ADD or something akin?

That's not an insult, it's a question.

And, are you sure you want to open a discussion of hypocrisy. You consistently demonstrate hypocrisy via your posts.

270 posted on 11/25/2010 9:05:32 AM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: Beckwith

The discussion was about persons born to US parents overseas — specifically on US military bases. Yet you introduce persons born in the US in your last snide post.
Do you have ADD or something akin?

That’s not an insult, it’s a question.

And, are you sure you want to open a discussion of hypocrisy. You consistently demonstrate hypocrisy via your posts.


There was a fascinating lawsuit against John McCain in New Hampshire (Hollander v McCain) which attempted to disqualify Senator McCain as not being a natural born citizen. Attorneys representing Senator McCain and the Republican National Committee moved to dismiss the lawsuit on grounds of lack of legal standing to sue and they prevailed. The lawsuit was dismissed. However the defense did submit a copy of Senator McCain’s birth certificate. Here’s a link, make sure to scroll down and click on the birth certificate copy.
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/hollanderv.mccain.php

Also, be sure to read the court’s Order Granting Motion to Dismiss.


273 posted on 11/25/2010 9:22:55 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

To: Beckwith
The discussion was about persons born to US parents overseas — specifically on US military bases. Yet you introduce persons born in the US in your last snide post.

That was part of the U.S. Code that you introduced. So if McCain is not a natural born citizen because his birth circumstances were included in that part of the code then what do you think paragraph a) refers to?

276 posted on 11/25/2010 12:54:42 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson