Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bobby Schindler: Society Ignores Terri Schiavo But Health Care Rationing Not Going Away
Life News ^ | 11/23/10 | Bobby Schindler

Posted on 11/23/2010 4:05:58 PM PST by wagglebee

Last week, former U.S. President, George W. Bush released a memoir of his tenure in office called “Decision Points.” In this 500-plus page account, Bush revisits a number of official and personal events, as well as choices that shaped both his presidency and his attitudes in private life.

I was disappointed to learn that Bush’s actions in March of 2005—that led to the passage of Terri’s Law—were not a part of this account. On March 20, 2005 in what was called the Palm Sunday Compromise, Congress passed “Relief of the Parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo”—a law that gave the Federal court access to review of the case to dehydrate my sister, Terri Schiavo, to death. President Bush left his home in Texas—in the middle of the night—to return to Washington, D.C. in order to sign this bill into law.

Some would praise him as a pro-life hero and a friend to the disabled. Others sharply criticized him for involving himself in a state circuit case. Yet nearly all would remark that his actions were extraordinary and historic.

Why, then, has Bush not recounted that experience in his memoir? A friend has reasoned with me that Bush may have some regrets over the matter, or even embarrassment with how it was handled and eventually politicized by both politicians and the corporate media.

I tend to think there is something more at play. Indeed, no major media outlets or political pundits have revisited Terri’s case since her death in 2005. It’s almost as though a memorandum has been circulated warning those in positions of influence that Terri’s name is political poison, or that the notion of forced death died with Terri on that day in March.

Unfortunately, it did not. As we have seen through our work to protect the lives of disabled people, cases like Terri’s persist. They just simply aren’t getting the “face time” anymore.

People like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and so many others were tremendous supporters of Terri’s rights in the years we fought to protect her life. Now they’ve fallen silent on the issue, and it’s an issue that isn’t going away. It is most troublesome.

Care rationing and the act of denying profoundly disabled people ordinary care (such as food and hydration via feeding tubes, antibiotics, etc.) is as prevalent now as it was when Terri’s case was making its way through Florida’s Sixth Judicial Circuit. The reason you don’t hear about such things is clear: media leaders and public servants simply won’t talk about them.

There appears to be a fear of taboo in mentioning the Schiavo case, and perhaps that’s because of how it played out and how polarizing it ultimately became. But, let’s not forget that Terri’s case was one that was watched across the globe, was discussed by civil liberties proponents, in religious communities, through groups serving the needs of disabled people, and even in the halls of Congress.

This was no small story and it brought to light a very scary proposition: that your rights fall into incredible jeopardy the moment your life is touched by a disability or complicated illness.

The danger hasn’t gone away. Indeed, it might be getting worse. But the conversation that favors life has dried up. The debate over privacy interests has been dismantled. And the awareness of the rights of disabled and ailing people is all but a memory.

When you do hear chatter or witness opinion on life and death, it’s nearly always on the side of death. Recently economist and New York Times columnist, Paul Krugman, opined that the answer to our current financial crisis is a combination of sales taxes and death panels. There’s that term again.

But Krugman is not alone. There are plenty of proponents of recent health care legislation that would be happy to tell you that cooler heads need to decide who’s fit to live and who’s entitled to receive wanted care. Not surprisingly, they oftentimes point out older Americans and those with incurable conditions as the ones who are no longer viable.

If we are to protect our own lives then we must reject such notions and be keenly aware of how the laws work, how to advocate for ourselves, and why it’s important to do so. That includes the sharing of knowledge on difficult cases, similar to Terri’s, and how they find their way into our country’s courts.

My sister’s situation presented a unique opportunity for those in the public eye to bring forward the issues surrounding health care, disability, personal liberties and retained rights. And prior to her death, they did. My family and others touched by this issue were grateful. But, where are they now?

It may go without saying, but rarely does a day go by that I don’t think about my sister and the suffering she was made to endure. I’m also very much aware that there are countless others who face the same fate, particularly so since the organization we established in Terri’s memory receives hundreds of calls from people who are desperate for help in defending a loved one’s life.

When Terri died, President Bush issued the following statement:

“Today millions of Americans are saddened by the death of Terri Schiavo. I urge all those who honor Terri Schiavo to continue to work to build a culture of life, where all Americans are welcomed and valued and protected, especially those who live at the mercy of others. The essence of civilization is that the strong have a duty to protect the weak. In cases where there are serious doubts and questions, the presumption should be in the favor of life.”

He’s correct, of course. But if Mr. Bush is not writing and reflecting about it today—and if we’re not talking about it—then we’re not educating people like we should. Consequently, we’re not doing what’s necessary to spread that message. We’re pushing the issue aside and pretending it’s no longer a problem. Avoidance and denial of what happened to Terri is not going to save lives or protect the liberties of individuals today and in the future. Aggressively working to teach the public the truth about this vital topic so that innocent Americans can never be starved and dehydrated to death again is the right course and commitment.

The people who do not value your life have plenty to say; and they are rather bald-faced about it.

If people like President Bush truly believe the lives of vulnerable people are worthy of protection, they need to come back to the table and defend those lives with vigor and resolve— now, tomorrow and for years to come.

Bobby Schindler is the host of “America’s Lifeline” heard Saturdays on WGUL in Tampa and online through their Web site. He is the brother of Terri Schiavo.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deathpanels; moralabsolutes; prolife; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: metmom
It was to eliminate ANY POSSIBILITY of her screaming out again (like she did when she was told that they were removing the feeding tube).
21 posted on 11/23/2010 5:27:39 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

I doubt they ever ask themselves questions about their deeds. They couldn’t handle the answers. Cowards.


22 posted on 11/23/2010 5:50:00 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

btt


23 posted on 11/23/2010 6:08:07 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

In one case the government ALLOWED something to happen.
In the other case the government is MAKING something happen.

You really can’t see the distinction?


24 posted on 11/23/2010 6:21:09 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

The only reason the government was involved in the Schaivo case is because the family demanded that the court arbitrate between family members who couldn’t agree on what to do.

In Obamacare the government is forcing themselves on us.

You really can’t see the distinction?


25 posted on 11/23/2010 6:25:01 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DManA

If you’re trying to pretend the government didn’t order the killing of Terri Schiavo, you’re wrong. The government didn’t merely sit back and allow her estranged husband to kill her. The government ordered that she be denied food and water, in any form, forever.


26 posted on 11/23/2010 6:27:21 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

27 posted on 11/23/2010 7:42:17 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Thanks for the ping!


28 posted on 11/23/2010 9:21:20 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

God bless Bobby Schindler.


29 posted on 11/24/2010 6:07:46 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; amdgmary; Sun; EternalVigilance; Lesforlife; metmom; Coleus; ...
In one case the government ALLOWED something to happen.
In the other case the government is MAKING something happen.

You really can’t see the distinction?

There is no distinction:

In Terri's case, the government DID NOT "allow" Terri to be killed, the government ORDERED that Terri not be given basic necessities (e.g. food and water).

In the case of Zero's death panels, they will also ORDER that a person not be given basic necessities.

My suspicion is that those of you who try to to distinguish between Terri's murder and the impending death panels are actually fine with both, you just don't like the fact that Obama's name is attached to the latter.

30 posted on 11/24/2010 6:31:36 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
What a beautiful rose. The White Rose Resistance lives on.
31 posted on 11/24/2010 7:15:11 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Great observation. I think your suspicion is right.


32 posted on 11/24/2010 7:18:44 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb; trisham; metmom
Great observation. I think your suspicion is right. Of course I'm right, I'm ALWAYS right when it comes to this stuff! :-)
33 posted on 11/24/2010 7:21:59 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

But of course!


34 posted on 11/24/2010 7:22:58 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; BykrBayb; metmom

Both involve a government that devalues human life. It’s as simple as that.


35 posted on 11/24/2010 7:30:19 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: trisham; BykrBayb; metmom
You seem to have missed the point of my post, the point I wanted to get across is that I am ALWAYS right! :-)
36 posted on 11/24/2010 7:35:27 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Terri lives on.


37 posted on 11/24/2010 7:49:01 AM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Always, Dear Leader! :-)


38 posted on 11/24/2010 7:53:10 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Now that's just mean!
39 posted on 11/24/2010 7:56:09 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; BykrBayb; metmom

Oh, THAT! Doesn’t that go without saying? :)


40 posted on 11/24/2010 8:19:05 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson