Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise; All

I’m not sure that dressed in black and won’t look at the defendent is a good sign. Time will tell.


4 posted on 11/23/2010 11:30:22 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
"I’m not sure that dressed in black and won’t look at the defendent is a good sign."

You shouldn't read anything into that one way or the other.

6 posted on 11/23/2010 11:35:31 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

Multiple inquiries. Austin jury may WANT to find him guilty but frankly doesn’t sound like the burden of proof is there. Claim made is that the law that the prosecutor would LIKE to prosecute was passed AFTER the action occurred.


8 posted on 11/23/2010 11:43:03 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

I was thinking the same thing.


22 posted on 11/23/2010 12:06:02 PM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson